|
|
| |||
|
IN-DEPTH FEATURES
My father, Dr. Howard (Tzvi) Plaut, hareini kaporas
mishkovo, was born in Europe on Rosh Chodesh Iyar, 5669
(1909), and was niftar on 27 Shvat, 5766 in Silver
Spring, Md. These thoughts were collected and distilled from
reflections made during the shiva for him and are
being published le'iluy nishmoso.
One of the main points I want to make is that there are
two common beliefs about German Jewry that are myths: 1] Most
German Jews were Reform; 2] the German Jews did not leave
Germany in time to escape the destruction of the
Holocaust.
The Judaism of Small-Town German Jewry
My father grew up in a small town in German named
Witzenhausen. He was born in Stutgart but the family moved
back to Witzenhausen to be with their extended family when
his father went to fight for the Kaiser in World War I. He
did not see his father for five years, from when he was five
until he was ten (1914-1919). Even though his father was
fighting in the army only a few hundred kilometers away at
most, there were no vacations or breaks.
He remembered the Jewish community of Witzenhausen to have
consisted of about 40 Jewish families — about 150
people altogether. They were an organized community. There
was a nice building for a shul and also a separate
school for the Jewish children, both built by the German
state, which provided for the Jewish needs of the
community.
There was a Lehrer, whom he remembers as a prestigious
and dignified man, who spoke in shul and taught some of the
subjects in the school. He and another official were paid by
the state to take care of religious functions for the
community. On the other hand, the salary cannot have been
overly generous, because the Lehrer also had a textile
store.
One of these two state-employees led the services throughout
the entire year and also read from the Torah, probably the
second official. The Lehrer also blew the
shofar and slaughtered chickens. My father did not
remember it, but probably the Lehrer was also a
mohel. Another schochet came around every week
to slaughter other animals.
The Jewish community was homogeneous and religious. For
example, my father's family built their own succah
every year and he recalled that most families had their own
succah. The shul also had its own succah. Each
family had its own lulav and esrog, and he did
not remember the cost as having been particularly high.
On Chanukah they lit their menorah in the window,
using candles.
This was a deeply-rooted Judaism that did not know of the
sicknesses of Reform and Haskoloh, and also did not know of
the Frankfurt cure. It was a community that continued
placidly along the life path that Jews in Germany followed
since the time of the Rishonim.
It was a community of simple people who largely lived a
simple life. Most were storekeepers or practiced a trade.
Many dealt in cattle. The most common occupation given in our
family tree which dates back more than 300 years is
Fiehandler — cattle dealer. My father's father
dealt in cattle hides, and his grandfather (Plaut) who lived
in Abterode, an even smaller town about an hour-and-a-half
away, dealt in cattle.
From 1575 (5335) when a yeshiva was founded there, and for
about a century afterwards, Witzenhausen was the center of
Torah learning in the area, but the Jews of my father's time
were not learned. In fact the name of the town is traced to
that period. Witzenhausen means "the home of wisdom,"
and it referred to the center of Torah learning that
flourished there.
The Jews of Witzenhausen were even largely untouched by any
winds of modernity, including non-Jewish learning. My father
was the only one of his peer group to attend Gymnasium
— formal study through high school. He attended as a
means to achieve a career as a professional. (He later
studied law.) Although he had 9 years of Latin and 7 of Greek
at that school, the classics being the main material that was
studied, he did not study Hebrew at the Gymnasium, even
though it was taught there for those who were studying for a
religious (Christian) career. Hebrew was not necessary for
those hoping to practice law. He did study Hebrew but only in
the Jewish school in Witzenhausen. (The Gymnasium was in
nearby Munden.) The learning of the classics did not arouse
any questions or challenges to his pure Jewish faith. He
retained a strong and pure connection to his Judaism
throughout his life, in all the countries and environments
that he went through.
Although he did not suffer the extreme persecution
experienced by those who went through the Concentration
Camps, he had a difficult life. He was thrust into America on
his own, and he struggled for many years to establish
himself. Eventually he secured a respectable job with the
Treasury Department in Washington, D.C. — though only
after many years of job search.
His loyalty to Jewish tradition was very deep-rooted. This
attachment was not shaken by his worldly experience.
This life and mindset — a thorough, though simple,
religiosity — was characteristic of a substantial part
of German Jewry. Those who lived in the small towns were not
exposed to the winds of modernity. As Professor Mordechai
Breuer writes (Modernity Within Tradition, A Social
History of Orthodox Jewry in Imperial Germany, p. 39),
"Jewish life in numerous villages and small towns was
influenced neither by Reform nor by Neo-Orthodoxy... Their
piety was artless, there were few questions and even less
philosophy. Their loyalty to the law was anchored in a
rudimentary fear of G-d and secured by a deep respect for
past and contemporary learned rabbis."
Here is a description of the small community of Nordheim,
written in the early part of the twentieth century by Rabbi
Bernard Drachman (in his autobiography The Unfailing
Light), an American who went there to visit his family:
"... to me it was ... deeply impressive. The reason for this
great impressiveness was that I recognized — and no one
could fail to recognize — the utter sincerity of these
simple souls, that to them their Judaism was a compellingly
real and vital faith, an indissoluble part of their thought
world, in fact, their very lives. Nothing there of the split
and divided souls, ... which I had observed in the great
metropolis of America and which I knew to exist not only
everywhere in that vast continent but in the great cities of
the Old World as well. The Judaism of Nordheim was simple,
clear, and unquestioningly loyal. In the little synagogue on
that first Friday evening and during the rest of the Sabbath
observance on the morrow, I felt this genuineness and
axiomatic loyalty and the perception and appreciation thereof
penetrated to the very depth of my heart. I began to
understand what real Sabbath observance is and what a
hallowing and uplifting influence upon one's entire
personality and life outlook it possesses."
Nordheim and Witzenhausen were typical of more than a
thousand such small Jewish communities all over Germany.
The general impression that many people have, even people of
German heritage, is that the vast majority of German Jewry
was Reform or assimilated, with the notable exception of the
Frankfurt community that was saved by HaRav Shamshon Rafael
Hirsch. This impression is false at almost every step.
Jewish Life in the Large German Cities
Assimilation, Reform, Haskalah and the like were serious
plagues mainly in the large German cities. They were
virtually unheard of — or at most very weak — in
the small towns of Germany. Even in the large cities, they
did not overwhelm the community except in the famous and
unique case of Frankfurt am Main.
Exactly how much of German Jewry lived in the small towns is
not a matter that I intend to discuss in detail here, but it
was clearly a substantial part. According to the
Encyclopedia Judaica, in 1925 (according to an
official census) a third of the 564,379 Jews in Germany lived
in 1,800 places with organized Jewish communities (like
Witzenhausen and Nordheim) and 1,200 places with no organized
communities. Roughly a third lived in Berlin, and another
third in the other large cities. At the beginning of the
nineteenth century they lived almost exclusively in villages
and small towns, but by 1900, the majority — though by
no means all — of German Jews lived in big cities.
According to Marion Kaplan ("Redefining Judaism in Imperial
Germany: Practices, Mentalities, and Community," Jewish
Social Studies, Volume 9, Number 1), in 1871 only about
30 percent of German Jews lived in big cities. Whereas 60
percent of German Jews in 1910 lived in urban areas with more
than 100,000 inhabitants (Kaplan says 70 percent but her
definition may be different), by 1933 more than 70 percent of
German Jews resided in large cities. Only 10 percent of
German Jews lived in the countryside by then, while 20
percent lived in smaller towns and villages (Encyclopedia
Judaica, "Germany," vol 7, pp. 480-487).
Even among the large cities, Frankfurt was probably the worst
in terms of the assault on traditional Judaism, because of
the unique circumstances in that community. As explained by
Rabbi Eliyahu Meir Klugman in Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch,
Architect of Torah Judaism for the Modern World
(Artscroll - Mesorah, pp. 112-117), Napoleon appointed Prince
Primate Karl von Dalberg as regent of the Frankfurt area, and
he in turn packed the governing council of the Frankfurt
Jewish community with Reformers in 1808.
Though the regent's reign was short-lived, the damage to the
Frankfurt community was not, since he gave the council the
power to appoint new members without holding community
elections. This ensured that the entire power of the
community was under the complete control of Reformers (many
of whom were Freemasons as well) and they were strong and
ruthless in suppression of Judaism with nothing to stand in
their way.
At the beginning of the 19th century the official Jewish
institutions of Frankfurt warred openly against all aspects
of Jewish tradition, but this did not happen in any other
German Jewish community. Although at the end of the 18th
century Frankfurt boasted the Haflo'oh as its rov, and HaRav
Nosson Adler and the young HaRav Moshe Sofer among its
residents, from 1818 to 1838 it was illegal to operate a
talmud Torah in Frankfurt, and anyone caught teaching
Torah was subject to a civil fine of 50 florins. The
mikveh was sealed and women had to use the facilities
of neighboring towns which were open. There were many women
who did. The Community Board declared that anyone who put on
tefillin was ineligible to serve as a Board member.
The pressures were enormous. Until HaRav Hirsch won the right
of secession from the community in 1878, every Jew was a
member of the community, like it or not.
This was unique to Frankfurt. As Rabbi Klugman writes, "In no
other Jewish community did proponents of assimilation work so
diligently, and for that matter so successfully, to achieve
their aims." (p. 115)
In Hamburg, for example, even though it suffered the first
steps of what later became the Reform movement, the Reformers
never encompassed more than half of the community, and they
did not have control. They had influence due to their
numbers, but they did not have the dominance that the
Reformers of Frankfurt had. The kehilloh of Hamburg
encompassed great ovdei Hashem and talmidei
chachomim until its demise.
Nonetheless, there were many, like my father z"l and
the third of German Jewry that lived in the small towns, who
retained a deep attachment to their Jewish roots that did
remain unchanged in all circumstances. Even if the depth of
their learning was minimal, their visceral commitment was
very strong.
Although we do not mean to belittle the awful damage done by
the Reform and their colleagues, as Hitler rose to power in
what was to be the beginning of the end of German Jewry,
somewhere upwards of a third of it was still steeped in
ancient traditions, comprised of the majority of the
residents of the small towns, and substantial proportions of
the larger communities as well.
Unfortunately there was an upheaval after Hitler rose, and
many were jarred out of the ancient habitats and habits. They
moved, or fled, to Israel, America, and many other places
including South America. Many of them proved no better at
holding on to their heritage when they encountered modernity
elsewhere in the world than their Eastern European
counterparts. But our next point is precisely this: that most
of them in fact had fled from Germany by the time the war
broke out and the "Final Solution" was hatched.
Second Myth: German Jewry Ignored the Clear
Signs of Impending Doom
This notion, which has become so widespread as to be a
historical truth that "everyone knows," was started by those
whose agenda certainly placed very little emphasis on
historical truth. It is not true of German Jewry, most of
whom fled, and it is not true of Polish Jewry, most of whom
were murdered.
According to the census of June 16, 1933, the Jewish
population of Germany, including the Saar region (which at
that time was still under the administration of the League of
Nations and not Germany itself), was approximately 505,000
people out of a total population of 67 million, or somewhat
less than 0.75 percent. That number represented a reduction
from the estimated 523,000 Jews living in Germany six months
earlier in January 1933 when Hitler first took control; the
decrease was due in large part to emigration following the
Nazi takeover that January. (An estimated 37,000 Jews —
about seven percent of the total — emigrated from
Germany during all of 1933.)
Some 80 percent (about 400,000) of the Jews in Germany held
German citizenship. The remainder were mostly Jews of Polish
citizenship. Many of the Polish Jews had been born in Germany
and had permanent resident status.
About 70 percent of the Jews in Germany lived in urban areas,
with 50 percent of all Jews living in the 10 largest German
cities. The largest Jewish center was in Berlin (about
160,000 in 1925), though they were less than 4 percent of the
city's entire population. Other large Jewish population
centers included Frankfurt am Main (about 26,000), Breslau
(about 20,000), Hamburg (about 17,000), Cologne (about
15,000), Hannover (about 13,000), and Leipzig (about 12,000).
Nevertheless, in 1933 more than one in five German Jews still
lived in small towns.
Starting in 1933 and without letup for the next six years
(until the outbreak of open fighting in September 1939)
German Jews tried, with increasing desperation, to leave. The
question of whether or not to go was on everyone's lips. How
could it not be? My father, who left within about a year of
Hitler's rise, remembered anti-Semitic marches in Kassel,
where he worked. Hitler Youth marched through the streets
shouting anti-Jewish slogans. It was not subtle and it was
not ignored by the Jews. It was clear to them that they had
no future in Hitler's Germany.
About a month after Kristalnacht, at the end of 1938
in a program known as the Kindertransport, the United Kingdom
admitted 10,000 unaccompanied Jewish children on an
"emergency" basis. These were youngsters: the rule for
eligibility was that they could be no older than 17. Still
their parents sent them away to an unknown but safe country
to escape the clear threats evident in Germany. It is not a
move that would be made by anyone who was not desperate, but
by then the situation was very serious and everyone knew
it.
1939 was the first time the United States filled its combined
German-Austrian quota of immigrants. The limit did not come
close to meeting the demand: by the end of June 1939, 309,000
German, Austrian, and Czech Jews had applied for the 27,000
places available under the quota. These were the late movers.
Many, many German Jews left earlier.
By September 1939 when Hitler invaded Poland in a bold move
that stunned the entire world, approximately 282,000 Jews had
left Germany — considerably over half of those who were
counted in June 1933 — and 117,000 from annexed
Austria. Of these, some 95,000 emigrated to the United
States, 60,000 to Palestine, 40,000 to Great Britain, and
about 75,000 to Central and South America, with the largest
numbers entering Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Bolivia. More
than 18,000 Jews from the German Reich were also able to find
refuge in Shanghai, China.
At the end of 1939, about 202,000 Jews remained in Germany
and 57,000 in annexed Austria, many of them elderly —
and many others ultra-assimilated Jews, most with non-Jewish
spouses, who were convinced that when he railed against the
Jews Hitler surely did not mean to criticize them. By October
1941, when Jewish emigration was officially forbidden, the
number of Jews in Germany had declined further to 163,000.
The vast majority of those Jews still in Germany at that late
date were murdered in Nazi camps and ghettos during the
Holocaust. It is worth noting that by the late 1930s, the
definition being used was the Nuremberg Laws racial
definition, which counted assimilated Jews and apostates.
This emigration was reflected in Witzenhausen on its own
scale. My father recalled the Jewish community of his youth
as numbering about 150 souls. Today in Witzenhausen there is
a memorial plaque that reads: "After inhuman cruelty, 55 men,
women and children of the Judishen Gemeinde of
Witzenhausen lost their lives in Concentration Camps."
So in Witzenhausen the proportion of those who fled
successfully to those who were murdered is about two-to-one,
just as in the overall German community. Although we have no
figures to support this and little prospect of being able to
produce any, we think that based on the historical experience
of other communities that experienced such rapid population
shifts, it is reasonable to speculate that those remaining in
Germany to the bitter end were disproportionately older
and/or with other strong disincentives to travel, including
those who felt that they were so assimilated as to be "Aryan
enough" to be acceptable to the Nazis. In fact, the numbers
of Jews remaining in Germany as the Final Solution began to
take shape and be implemented are not fully comparable to the
earlier census figures. The earlier numbers counted those who
were part of the Jewish community (Gemeinde), but the
later figures followed the Nuremburg definition and included
those who converted out.
Even as German Jewry fled the oncoming Nazi Holocaust, the
neighboring Jewish communities did not. For example, about 98
percent of the prewar Polish Jewish community was wiped out,
Hy"d. Did they ignore a danger that was evident?
Hitler had been threatening war with Poland for years, under
various pretexts. Nonetheless, no one really expected it.
Many historians even doubt if Hitler intended to begin a war
on the scale of what actually took place.
Britain and France had for years been following a policy of
appeasement with respect to Hitler. They believed that his
real desires were relatively modest and he could be sated at
a reasonable cost. Our historical perspective makes it hard
for us to fully appreciate the way things looked at the time.
To us the British and French policy of the time seems grossly
out of touch with reality and, indeed, "appeasement" has
become a term of political invective as a policy that does
not work.
But British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain certainly
believed that his approach was correct and effective. He
declared, in all evident sincerity, that with the Munich
agreement he had achieved, "peace for our time." Moreover he
was supported by the French government and hailed by many for
his achievement.
Poland — the center of controversy and ultimately the
beginning of the conflict — was actually preparing for
a possible war with Germany. When Hitler attacked it in
September of 1939 it had already started building up and
modernizing its forces, but its assessment of the likelihood
of war can be inferred from its target date for completing
the project: 1942!
We must remember that we Jews had been the object of
persistent, recurring, vicious and uncivilized antisemitism
for as long as our collective memory of life in the European
exile stretched. Poland had its share of antisemites, and
there were serious antisemitic moves even as Jews were
participants in the national government. Hitler's rantings
against Jews, and even Julius Streicher's virulent writings,
were perceived as just another part of a long tradition, and
not as something that could lead to a new form of extreme
persecution. Nonetheless the German Jews apparently did see
it as such — or at least as something intolerable
— since so many of them decided to voluntarily leave
their ancestral residence of hundreds and thousands of
years.
Jews who lived in European countries outside of Germany could
thus very reasonably have remained where they were, even if
they followed world news very closely. Virtually all the
leading politicians and statesmen of the day did not expect
war, and a reasonable man would thus have concluded that any
evil that Hitler would carry out would be confined to his
countrymen. Why should a Polish Jew think he should leave
Europe because of a German rosho?
Even in retrospect, there is no reason to suspect that their
lives were under the sword any more seriously than they would
be in many other places in the world. Even living under a
threat of annihilation is more-or-less within the bounds of
what passes for normalcy in our state of golus.
*
Clearly an article of this scope does not exhaust the
material about my father, and certainly not German Jewry as a
whole.
I suggest, however, that my father's example of living with a
deep and persistent connection to Jewish tradition is what
has sustained the Jewish people throughout the varied
vicissitudes of our long exile, and it has lost none of its
relevance and effectiveness, for now and until the coming of
Moshiach Tzidkeinu, bimeheiroh beyomeinu, Omen.
|
All material
on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.