Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

18 Av 5764 - August 5, 2004 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

OBSERVATIONS

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

HOMEPAGE

 

Produced and housed by
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Shema Yisrael Torah Network

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NEWS
Ministers say 2005 Budget will Hurt the Weakest
by Yated Ne'eman Staff

Likud ministers criticized the proposed state budget for 2005 when Prime Minister Ariel Sharon presented it to cabinet this week. Health Minister Danny Naveh in particular said that it will cause great harm to the sick and the elderly.

Sensitive to charges that his government so far has been cruel to the helpless, Sharon told the ministers that the budget will take care of the weak sectors of the population, while continuing the reforms in the economy.

But the other ministers did not agree. Health Minister Danny Naveh said that the proposal was simply not socially just and even Deputy Prime Minister and Trade Minister Ehud Olmert, who is usually a close ally of Sharon, said that the budget was not good.

Some pundits said that Olmert's detailed criticism was coordinated with Sharon and was partly, or indirectly, directed at Finance Minister Netanyahu as well as at his budget. Netanyahu and Sharon have had their differences over the past six months.

No decisions were taken Sunday, and discussions about specific cuts and how the budget will be allocated were postponed until the next meeting, on Sunday August 8, and also to the Knesset socioeconomic committee headed by Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the budget was designed to maintain the growth in the economy and to strengthen certain social elements. This would be done via assistance to the elderly, the gradual implementation of the reforms in the education system (according to the recommendations of the Dovrat Commission), funding for new immigrants and the hot meal program for schools.

Netanyahu said the government's main objective had to be a long-term growth rate of 4-5 percent, although the treasury is expecting only a 3.8 percent growth rate in 2005. He said that social gaps should be closed through broad based growth that will benefit everyone.

Experience in other parts of the world has shown that the movement to a free economy brought rapid growth, he added, and thus the treasury was proposing privatization in a long list of sectors such as electricity, water, sewage and the capital market.

Naveh declared: "The budget that the treasury is drawing up will be antisocial. Without significant additions to the health basket -- and with medicines being taken off the basket, hospitals being closed, fewer hospital beds, and no additional help for frail patients -- this will merely be a budget with yet more and more decrees and cuts."

The minister charged that the treasury is creating two kinds of medicine in Israel: for the rich and for the poor. "The treasury officials want us to pay more from our pockets for medication and medical services, and they want the government to invest less in health," Naveh said, adding that it was essential to have more funds for hospitalizing the elderly, for premature babies and for cancer treatments.

It is clear that if health care is financed by individuals and not by the government, the rich will be able to afford more.

The Health Minister and Treasury officials who were present exchanged harsh words. Naveh said that the Treasury was planning to set up a fifth health maintenance organization fund run by insurance companies without consulting the Health Ministry. Treasury officials responded that they had met six times with Health officials. Naveh said the subject of the new HMO had never come up in those discussions for a serious debate. Banging his fists on the table, he proclaimed that the Treasury was hiding the truth.

Olmert accused the Finance Ministry of being dogmatic and inflexible, explaining that a NIS 6-7 billion cut could be counterproductive and cause a slowdown in the economy and further unemployment. He proposed that the budget be raised by 1.7 percent next year, the same as the population growth.

The proposed budget for 2005 will again adversely affect people who receive benefits from the National Insurance Institute. The most significant proposed step is that employers pay less toward their workers' NII benefits. This is intended to encourage employment and to compensate employers for having to pay toward the workers' pensions. The 1.5 percent deduction the employers will get will, however, mean a loss of NIS 5.3 billion to the NII.

Welfare Minister Zevulun Orlev warned Sunday that this would lead to cuts in allowances, welfare budgets, education and health, and added that his National Religious Party would not be able to support a budget of this kind.

Together with talk of economic reforms and reducing unemployment, Sharon reiterated the importance of moving ahead with the disengagement plan.

Treasury officials said the 2005 budget deficit would not exceed 3 percent of gross domestic product and government expenditures would not expand by more than 1 percent compared to the 2004 budget, as agreed in the framework of the US loan- guarantee deal.

Coalition negotiations may force the government to make changes in the budget and the arrangements bill that accompanies it. The cabinet is likely to approve the Treasury's proposals next week, which include cuts of NIS 6 billion. The total budget is expected to be NIS 222b.

The Defense Ministry is expected to sustain the single largest cut -- NIS 2b. to NIS 3b. The Defense Ministry is also very much against the budget. The Treasury wants to cut another NIS 2b. to NIS 3b. from the budget mainly by lowering public sector wages.

Industry, Trade and Labor Minister Ehud Olmert called for increased transparency during the budget-making process. One of Olmert's recommendations is the adoption of two-year budgets in order to send a message of stability to the world markets. He added that the two-year budget scheme would free ministries and government offices to devote more time to providing services and less time to annual bickering over budget cuts.

 

All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.