Following are excerpts from several shmuessen
delivered last year during Sivan and Tammuz before
talmidim in Yeshivas Kol Torah in Yerushalayim. It was
prepared for publication by an independent listener (and not
by HaRav Deutsch).
Part I
Yirmiyohu the novi laments (9:11-12), "Who is the wise
man who may understand this, and who is he to whom the mouth
of Hashem has spoken, that he may declare it? Why did the
land perish, and is burned up like a wilderness that none
passes through? And Hashem says, `Because they have forsaken
My Torah which I set before them, and have not obeyed My
voice, nor walked therein, but have walked after the
stubbornness of their own heart, and after the Ba'alim, as
their fathers taught them.'"
The gemora (Nedorim 81a) writes, "The sages and
nevi'im were asked [what `nor walked therein' means],
but they could not explain it, until HaKodosh Boruch
Hu Himself explained that [the Jews at the time of the
churban] did not make a brocho on the Torah
before they studied it." The rishonim revealed to us
the depth of this sin, one that the sages and nevi'im
at the time of the churban could not grasp. See the
Ran (ibid.) in the name of Rabbenu Yonah, who
interprets the sin as being that the Torah was not
sufficiently important for them to make a brocho on
it.
The Rambam seems to rule that bircas HaTorah is
derabonon, since he does not cite bircas
HaTorah in his Sefer Hamitzvos. The Shaagas
Arye (chap. 24) asks that from the above gemora we
can infer that bircas HaTorah is mideOraisa. If
it were derabonon, having been initiated by the Anshei
Knesses Hagedola who lived several generations after
Yirmiyohu, it would have been impossible for it to have any
connection to the churban. If, on the other hand,
bircas HaTorah is mideOraisa, Jews were
obligated to say it long before the destruction.
This kushya on the Rambam can be resolved, since the
Rambam had another way of interpreting the above-mentioned
gemora. In Teshuvos Pe'er Hador the Rambam
himself writes that at the time of the churban, "even
if there were several talmidei chachomim in the
beis knesses, [those present] would give an
aliya to a Cohen who was an am ha'aretz or who
was lesser than they in wisdom . . . and [by doing so] they
caused this [churban], since they diminished the honor
of a talmid chochom and those who study the Torah."
The sin's depth was their diminishing kvod HaTorah by
honoring those with less Torah knowledge.
The Chidushei Chasam Sofer (ibid.) writes: "I
understand that the [people living at the time of the
churban] considered the Torah as being inferior --
only like the wisdom of other nations. Someone priding
himself on his knowledge of wisdom would first tell about his
knowing other wisdoms, and would conclude by saying, `And I
am proficient in Torah too.' The Torah writes `towards the
body of the menora' -- the Torah's light -- `the seven
lamps shall give light' (Bamidbar 8:2) -- referring to
the other seven wisdoms of the world, indicating that they
should serve the Torah's wisdom, as the Rambam writes."
Although the Chasam Sofer is stating a chidush, his
fundamental principle, that degrading lomdei Torah
can, chas vesholom, cause a churban, is surely
unarguable.
In fact, to reach a recognition of the value
of lomdei Torah we are first obliged to correctly
value the Torah itself.
The Torah declared a special day of matan Torah for
us. But is there not a daily mitzvah of "teach your sons and
your son's sons the day that you stood before Hashem your
Elokim in Choreiv" (Devorim 4:9)? The Chida in fact
considers this mitzvah of remembering the revelation on Mount
Sinai, when Hashem gave us the Torah, to be one of the
Torah's constant mitzvos.
If so, why do we have a special mitzvah to remember Matan
Torah on Shavuos? It is understandable that on Succos the
Torah declared a special yom tov, "that your
generations may know that I caused bnei Yisroel to
dwell in succos when I brought them out of the land of
Egypt" (Vayikro 23:43), but to remember our receiving
the Torah we do not need another mitzvah. We have such a
mitzvah every day anyway.
This question is actually relevant to Pesach too. We are
commanded on the Seder night to remember yetzias
Mitzrayim. This too is difficult to understand. Are we
not anyhow commanded to remember our leaving Egypt "all the
days of your life" (Devorim 16:3) -- by day and by
night? Why do we need a special mitzvah to remember it on
Pesach night? (It is possible that this too is included in
the meaning of mah nishtanah that children ask, "Why
is this night different from all other nights?")
We find the answer to this question in the Haggodo:
"We were slaves to Pharaoh in Egypt... and if HaKodosh
Boruch Hu had not taken us out of Egypt, we and our
children and our children's children would have remained
enslaved to Pharaoh in Egypt." On this night we do not
remember only the bare fact of our leaving Egypt. We remember
that if we had not left we would have continued to be
Pharaoh's slaves. In this way we reach the state where we
fulfill: "In every generation a person is obligated to see
himself as if he left Egypt." The Rambam (Hilchos Chometz
Umatzah 7:6) explains this as meaning that a person must
feel, "as if you yourself were a slave who was freed and
redeemed."
It seems to me that matan Torah was given to us so
that -- besides the actual remembering of matan Torah -
- we will remember what would have happened to us without
matan Torah. Likewise, the whole mitzvah of
remembering our emergence from bondage to freedom on Pesach
is because of yetzias Mitzrayim's main objective:
"When you have brought the people out of Egypt you shall
serve Elokim upon this mountain" (Shemos 3:12).
Without matan Torah we and our children would have
remained embedded and immersed in the forty-nine gates of
tumah.
Chazal (Pesochim 68b) write, "All agree that on
Atzeres (Shavuos) a person's own pleasure is needed too,
since it was the day on which the Torah was given." Rashi
(ibid.) explains that "this day is pleasant and well-
accepted in the estimation of Yisroel, for whom the Torah was
given." There is a special simcha in that bnei
Yisroel were not left immersed in tumah and
without Torah. This is why Rav Yosef (ibid.) would
make a special meal on Shavuos, since he said, "Without that
day, how many `Yosefs' would there be in the marketplace?"
This recognition needs to be strengthened by
us from time to time. We must reach a clear recognition that
without accepting Torah and mitzvos, every Jew is, chas
vesholom, liable to plummet down into the forty-nine
gates of tumah. "If the Creator had not created this
one medicine (Torah) for this wound, it would be altogether
impossible for a person to cure himself of this wound without
that medicine" (Mesilas Yeshorim, chap. 5). Studying
Torah is the only way to overcome the yetzer hora,
which daily stalks us and tries to kill us. The Chovos
Halevovos writes about the yetzer hora: "You are
unaware of it but it is aware of you." The main way to escape
temptations of lust and thoughts is kabolas HaTorah.
Without kabolas HaTorah a person can wander far off
the right path.
We must realize that this-worldly desires are not something
logical. Someone is not attracted to such things because he
thinks they are good. He is drawn to them without a rational
explanation of any benefit he can possibly derive from them.
An example of this is smoking cigarettes. A person knows that
smoking does not bring him any benefit, that it is not
healthful, and that it only damages his health, but he anyway
wants to smoke.
Maran the Rosh Yeshiva HaRav Elazar Man Shach shlita
once said that we see the yetzer's strength in the
Torah's statement, "Pharaoh's heart is heavy." Many people
are amazed and wonder how Pharaoh could possibly act so
foolishly. Maran told us how, when Yerushalayim was besieged
and shells were flying between the houses, there were some
prominent Jews who wanted to smoke a cigarette and actually
went outside to do so. Maran HaRav Shach said: "Didn't they
know of the danger involved in what they were doing? They
surely did. Did they think that smoking a cigarette overrides
pikuach nefesh? Of course not. But they wanted to
smoke a cigarette and that's it. Our case is the same," said
the Rosh Yeshiva.
When a person is faced with the temptations that Olom
Hazeh presents, it is insufficient to explain to himself
that succumbing to those temptations is illogical, or that it
will harm him, and other such rationalizations. The yetzer
hora works on another level altogether. What drives a
person to lustful behavior is his animal nefesh, which
does not understand arguments. Even if a person's
intelligence grasps that something is wrong, the
yetzer pulls in the opposite direction.
The only way for a person to fight against his animal
nefesh is to accept the yoke of Torah. By doing so,
and through engrossing himself in Torah studies and attaining
pleasure from them, a person acquires the power to abstain
from all the vanities of Olom Hazeh. He feels
satisfaction, pleasure and happiness from his Torah study.
This is exactly what Chazal (Kiddushin 30b) teach us,
that "a person's yetzer tries to overcome him every
day, and if not for HaKodosh Boruch Hu helping him he
could not subdue it." HaKodosh Boruch Hu gives us the
power to resist the yetzer, and that power is the
Torah!
The Chossid Ya'avetz said that during the time of the Spanish
Inquisition those who were moseir nefesh were those
who had emunah peshutah in Hashem, and not those whose
belief was based on philosophy. Indeed the best philosophy
cannot persuade a person that he needs to martyr himself.
Only a person who has emunah peshutah implanted in him
is prepared to sacrifice his life, since for him the only
life is the one the Torah dictates.
In this way HaRav Eliyahu Dessler zt'l explains why
throughout history we see many Jews who sacrificed their
lives for Hashem although they were not on a high spiritual
level. There are two ways by which a decision between good
and evil can be reached: either a person can be
intellectually convinced that good is good, or else it is
implanted in his nefesh that evil is so evil that life
with it is worthless.
This can be compared to telling someone that either he will
die or be turned into an animal. A person does not have to be
on a high level not to want to live the life of an animal.
For those who lived in previous generations, the idea that
death was preferable than life without Torah was an
unmovable, fundamental principle.
A hundred years ago, in the year 5658, a
writer who was one of the first Zionists described how the
Jewish State would look. He depicted Jews closing their
stores in the afternoon without even locking them. "Why lock
the stores? Jews are not thieves."
The question is, what was that writer's mistake?
He lived in the year 5658 (1898). At that time he knew that
Jews were not thieves. This was an indisputable fact. I do
not know if nobody ever stole anything, but surely they did
not commit armed robbery. Murder was never prevalent among
Jews.
However, this particular writer thought that the fact that
the Jewish Nation observed the Torah's laws had nothing to do
with their not being thieves or murderers. The two factors
were, for him, merely coincidental. He thought that it was
possible to establish a Jewish State without Torah, to uproot
the Torah from Klal Yisroel, and still have a country
where Jews do not steal or murder. He thought this was an
ingrained, natural trait of Jews.
We know differently. Jews are the "most brazen among the
nations" (Beitzah 25b). As far as their nature is
concerned they are brazen and inclined to do anything and
everything. Only the acceptance of Torah and mitzvos is what
nullifies that brazenness. The moment a Jew throws off the
yoke of Torah and mitzvos he can become a thief, a murderer,
and much worse.
Perhaps the Torah is actually telling us not to be misled by
such a mistake when it writes, "See, I have set before you
this day life and good, and death and evil . . . therefore
choose life, that you may live" (Devorim 30:15,19).
The obvious question is: What kind of a choice is that? When
a person sees life and death, he will certainly choose life.
But the Torah is talking to a person who says: "I surely do
not want death or evil. What I want is another way to live,
without observing the Torah."
HaKodosh Boruch Hu says to that person: "There is only
one way to live. If you sanctify yourself and observe what I
told you, that `[the Torah] is our life,' you will be saved
from death. If instead you look for other ways or
segulos, then what is waiting for you is only death
and evil."
End of Part I
HaRav Boruch Shmuel Deutsch is a rosh yeshiva in
Yeshivas Kol Torah in Yerushalayim.