Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

12 Adar II 5765 - March 23, 2005 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

OBSERVATIONS

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

HOMEPAGE

 

Produced and housed by
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Shema Yisrael Torah Network

Opinion & Comment
Closer

by Rabbi Avi Shafran

Sefer Vayikra, which we have now begun to read in shul, includes a number of fundamental moral precepts. But the Sefer is most readily identified with the sacrificial laws with which it begins and which appear throughout it.

The body of halachos regarding korbonos is large and complex. One of the six Sidrei Mishneh deals exclusively with those laws and related topics.

And yet, especially in the absence of the Beis Hamikdosh today, the idea of korbonos perplexes some Jews. The Torah's moral precepts, even many of its rituals, resonate agreeably with them. Charity, empathy and honesty; Shabbos, the sounding of the shofar and Yom Kippur do not discomfit them, and for many are self-evidently sublime. But killing animals and birds (or grinding wheat or barley) just to burn them or parts of them on an Altar — who, they ask, ordered that?

The answer, of course, is Hakodosh Boruch Hu. And, in the end, korbonos come close to the realm of chok. But we might nevertheless attempt some elemental understanding of at least the concept of korbon.

A good place to begin is with the observation that the word "sacrifice" is a misnomer. The word korbon does not indicate forfeiture in any way. Its root, as Rav Shamshon Rafael Hirsch notes, connotes "proximity," and, taking its form into account, it might best be rendered "that which brings close."

An approach to fathoming the import of the word may well lie in something the seforim hakedoshim describe, what one might call the hierarchy of creation.

The base level of worldly existence, according to that model, is domeim, the inanimate, the mineral matter that comprises the earth on which we stand. The next highest level consists of tzomeiach or the vegetative, the representative of life at its most rudimentary. The third consists of chai, the more meaningfully alive world of animals, which exhibit not only essential life, but willful movement and a degree of cognition. And then there is the top of the creation-pyramid, the medaber, or "speaker," the human being, possessor of the power of speech and, alone among creations, free will.

Each of the levels provides support for those above it. The mineral realm contains the chemicals that make plant life possible; plants serve as food for much of the animal world, and for humans; and the animal world, along with the others, serve the highest level, the human.

A crucial consequence of humanity's lofty position as the pinnacle and purpose of creation is our ability, and responsibility, to make choices, even choices that frustrate our physical natures. We are, after all, not mere animals, slaves to base instincts and desires, but something significantly more — something closer, at least potentially, to the Divine.

There is our word "closer." The more we conduct ourselves as if we were members of the rung beneath us, the more we distance ourselves from what is above us, from the One Who created all and Who wishes us to make choices, and to reap the benefit of serving Him. And, conversely, the more keenly we are aware of the essential distinction between the animal realm and the human, the closer we become to Hashem

According to our mesorah, there was a time in early human history when humans were forbidden to eat animals. After the Mabul, however, the eating of meat became permissible to mankind. One reason suggested for that change is based on the Midrashic tradition that the antediluvian generation had lost its essential moral bearings and considered humans to be mere "meat."

The Divine sanction of meat-eating, in that approach, was a means of ensuring that human beings recognize beyond question that they are special, possessive of a spark of holiness absent in animals.

Might the concept of korbon hold a similar message? Might the offering of an animal's meat, in other words, embody the idea that animals exist to serve human beings — and, thus, that human beings exist to serve what is above them? If so, some light is surely shed on the meaning of korbon as "that which brings close."

Certainly, there are deeper elements to the Torah's laws of korbonos, meanings to their myriad details that are beyond human ken. But perceiving what we can is still worthwhile. And in this case the perception might just hint to an understanding of Vayikra's inclusion of moral laws amid its laws of korbonos, an understanding that is both timeless — and timely, in morally confused eras like ours.

Rabbi Shafran is director of public affairs for Agudath Israel of America.


All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.