Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

5 Av 5765 - August 10, 2005 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

OBSERVATIONS

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

POPULAR EDITORIALS

HOMEPAGE

 

Produced and housed by
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Shema Yisrael Torah Network

Opinion & Comment
Politica: Knesset Members or Hilltop Youth?

By E. Rauchberger

Some 20 MKs from the right and left have announced their intentions to remain in the Gush Katif area during the Disengagement. The goal of the MKs from the right is to encourage the settlers to protest the evacuation and to act as a pacifying force if necessary. Meanwhile the goal of the MKs from the left is primarily to encourage the security forces and to see for themselves whether the plan is carried out properly.

All an MK has to do to enter the Gaza Strip is to flash his Member of Knesset ID card at a roadblock and drive right in with up to three assistants. But Knesset Officer Yitzhak Shedar made one stipulation. According to a directive he issued, the assistants must remain with the MK and register at the roadblock upon exiting and any MK who does not register them will be penalized: the next time he travels to Gush Katif he will have to go unaccompanied even if he claims all of the assistants came out with him.

This measure stems from concerns right-wing MKs could misuse their right to bring in three assistants during each visit, essentially smuggling outsiders into Gush Katif. In other words all 120 MKs are suspect of transgressing the law or abetting transgressors.

The directive also stipulates not just anyone can hop in the MK's car and cruise into Gush Katif, but rather only individuals with a valid, regular entry permit. So what is the security apparatus so afraid of? How many people have regular entry permits, are assistants to right-wing MKs and want to stay in Gush Katif illegally? No more than a handful meet this description.

The extreme directive, which offended many MKs, points to the great hysteria among government officials as the Disengagement draws near and their fears the evacuation will not go smoothly and could even deteriorate, choliloh, to the point of bloodshed.

The Anti-Education Ministry

The Education Ministry insists on not learning its lesson. On one hand ministry officials bemoan the state of decline among youth in government schools and the rise in violence everywhere and at every age level. On the other hand they do not seem to understand that the behavior of the young generation will not change until the education is upturned at the roots and the children provided with traditional values and their Jewish heritage.

Numerous committees have already hashed out the failure of the government education system and the innumerable reports written on the matter. And roadways are lined with billboards calling for the proposed reforms to be carried out. Yet the Education Ministry has yet to arrive at the most elementary solution—to strengthen the ties between children and their past—not because they are unaware this is the obvious solution but because they are afraid of it. Afraid of the results.

And in the 5766 school year they plan to make matters worse by adding a new subject to the curriculum: multiculturalism. The curriculum for multiculturalism includes anti-Israel stances by radical and militant Arabs.

Rather than highlighting the culture of the Jewish people, which is the only guarantee Israeli youth will retain its Jewish identity, the Education Ministry seeks to integrate various foreign cultures into the curriculum, a path sure to rapidly destroy any shreds of Jewish identity still remaining among students at government schools, equip them with universal values and sever them from any national and Jewish values they may have. This is what the Education Ministry—or more aptly the Anti-Education Ministry—stands to achieve.

MK Rabbi Meir Porush, who was shocked by the move, has announced he will demand an urgent meeting to discuss this issue in the Knesset Education Committee despite the summer recess, though he knows it is a lost cause. After all what can the Committee accomplish? The Education Ministry is headed by a Likud minister from the nationalist camp. The kind of Likud member who regularly proclaims herself to be close to the Jewish heritage. Yet she is the selfsame person behind the decision to add this new subject to the curriculum. So how could the Education Committee, which is headed by Avraham Poraz of Shinui, possibly do something to alter this decision?


All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.