Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

7 Cheshvan 5762 - October 24, 2001 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

OBSERVATIONS

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

HOMEPAGE

 

Produced and housed by
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Shema Yisrael Torah Network

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NEWS
Appeal Against Jerusalem's Highway 9: Environmental Hazard
by S. Fried

The Ramot Environmental Forum has joined with the Forum for Public Transportation in an appeal to the Jerusalem Regional Court to put a temporary work stoppage order on the projected paving of Highway number 9 between Motza on the main Jerusalem-Tel Aviv highway, and Derech Alon, the "Ramot Road." The new road would relieve the congestion at the entrance to Jerusalem, since traffic for the northern neighborhoods could bypass the current bottleneck near Givat Shaul. The traffic jams have gotten worse since shooting on the new road between Ben Shemen and Ramot (route 443) has made it unattractive to travelers.

The appeal against construction, presented by Attorney Danny Fish, cites several factors: The existing building permit was issued illegally and contains numerous deficiencies; the "acoustics" appendix dealing with the prevention of noise pollution for the residents of Ramot 02 has not been approved; and steps necessary to prevent harm to a number of animals and unique flora and fauna -- some in danger of extinction -- have not been taken. The project directors have not received the necessary permits for protection of protected species, they add.

In addition, the petitioners note that the road would jeopardize Jerusalem's water supply. They claim that there are a number of wells supplying water to Jerusalem and its environs along the planned route. The petitioners oppose start of construction of this road until implementation of the Government's decision of August 1997 to give preference to public transportation. In their opinion, large-scale investment in construction of this road constitutes discrimination against consumers of public transportation, as opposed to owners of private vehicles.

 

All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.