Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

17 Shevat 5766 - February 15, 2006 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

OBSERVATIONS

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

POPULAR EDITORIALS

HOMEPAGE

 

Produced and housed by
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Shema Yisrael Torah Network

Opinion & Comment
Alei Vrodim — a Treasure Trove

by G. Yisroeli

Pearls and peirushim, collectible phrases and commentary on maseches Brochos are found in Alei Vrodim, which was published last year when the Daf Hayomi study began that masechta. Its several hundred pages were compiled and arranged by HaRav Shlomo Levinstein, who is well known for his shiurim and droshos, together with his colleague, HaRav Tzvi Kreiser.

Some of the commentaries are aimed at explaining the simple textual meaning, while others weave in various gemoras quoted in this tractate. And interspersed among these are facts and good practices to stir up audiences to greater yiras Shomayim and dedication in serving their Creator.

Here are some samples.

Yoshvei Kronos — Literally, `Corner' Loiterers — Who are These?

Daf 28b: "Modeh Ani Lefonecho — I give my thanks before You, Hashem, my G-d, Who has placed my portion among the dwellers of the beis hamedrash, and did not leave my lot among yoshvei kronos."

Obviously, if He put our lot among the scholars of the beis hamedrash, it excludes our being among the idle loiterers. In Derech Sichah, HaRav Chaim Kanievsky explained that this refers to the loiterers, the idlers who are within the very walls of the beis hamedrash.

HaRav Yehuda Tzadka zt'l illuminated this in another way with a parable of two people who received a large sum of reparations. One invested the entire amount in the bank and spent only the interest that it earned, while the other kept dipping into the principal. If, in the beginning, they were equally endowed, after several years the second man will be left with nothing, for it will have all been spent injudiciously.

And thus are we. There are people who live in this world drawing from the principal, that is from their good deeds, with nothing remaining for Olom Habo. Therefore, we ask that we not be from those who live at the expense of the principal (yoshvei kronoskronos related to keren, principal), the initial sum, but use only the extra reward that accrues from the dividends while putting aside the main deposit for the World to Come.

Has the Body of a Dead Kohen Lost its Kedushoh?

Daf 46a: R' Zeira became ill. R' Abahu . . .

The gemora tells that R' Abahu vowed that if R' Zeira recuperated from his illness, he would make a seudas hodo'oh for his colleagues. R' Zeira did get better and R' Abahu celebrated the event with a feast. He honored R' Zeira with the blessing over the ceremonial bread but R' Zeira said that the halochoh called for the host to retain the honor, and so he did.

When it came time for Bircas Hamozone, R' Abahu wanted to honor R' Zeira again, but R' Zeira said, "Don't you think that the one who `broke bread' should also be the one who leads the Bircas Hamozone?"

The Otzar Hayediyos cites from the memorial work on R' Yitzchok Hutner zt'l, that R' Chaim Berlin quoted in the name of the Aderes that this gemora shows that after a Kohen dies, his personal sanctity is removed. This reasoning is as follows.

R' Zeira was a Kohen, so how could R' Abahu lead the Bircas Hamozone? The Torah commands us to honor a Kohen, as it is written, "Vekidashto" which means that the Kohen must be honored, such as by letting him lead Bircas Hamozone. But since the gemora tells us that Rabba slaughtered R' Zeira one Purim in his drunkenness and then prayed that he be revived, which he was, it must be that his brief death nullified his sanctity of priesthood. From here, the Aderes establishes that after a Kohen dies, his purity is removed, and that is why he did not have to give him precedence in leading Bircas Hamozone.

R' Chaim Berlin challenges the Aderes based on the gemora in Sanhedrin which asks: "Where do we find substantiation for techiyas hameisim in the Torah?" It answers: "Because it says, `And you shall give from it a trumas Hashem offering unto Aharon HaKohen' (Bamidbar 18:28). " But Aharon passed away in the desert, whereas terumah was only given in Eretz Yisroel. When could it be given to Aharon? We must, therefore, conclude that the Torah is referring to some future time, after techiyas hameisim, when Aharon will be restored to life. But we see that when he is revived after death, he will again serve in his priestly office!"

In Toras Kohanim we find written commentary on the verse, "This is the anointment of Aharon and the anointment of his sons from the offerings of Hashem" (Vayikra 7:35). It states explicitly that when these kohanim are resurrected from the grave, they will not require to be anointed again, for it is written, "R' Yehuda says: One might think that Aharon and his sons will require the oil of anointment in the future. This is not so, since it is written, `This is the anointment of Aharon and the anointment of his sons.' " So we see explicitly that they will not require new anointment, and not as the Aderes maintains that after a Kohen dies, he no longer maintains his sanctity as a priest.

Things Follow the Intent of the Heart

The gemora on Brochos, daf 15b.

Chassidim once told the Admor Chidushei HaRim zt'l about a certain apostate who, before his death wept, and said that he repents. He died with Shema Yisroel upon his lips. The Rebbe commented, "Of such a person does it say, `If he lends a voice, take no heed, for his heart is replete with abominations' (Mishlei 26:25)." That rosho only wished thereby to refute the saying of our Sages that the wicked — even upon the threshold of Gehennom do not repent . . . "

HaRav Hakodosh R' Avrohom of Kroshnowitz zt'l told the following: An antisemitic government once decreed the burning of all copies of Shulchan Oruch Choshen Mishpat. R' Yitzchok of Vorka zt'l picked himself up and went to Warsaw to discuss with his colleague, the Chidushei HaRim of Gur, what could be done to thwart this decree. They decided to pay a visit to a Jewish apostate who was on good terms with those government heads empowered to nullify this decree. They met with him and pleaded their cause very movingly.

He said, "If you guarantee that I will have a portion in Olom Habo, I will do what you ask."

They gave their word and he promised to do what he could.

On their way home, the Rabbi of Vorka expressed his surprise. "Just look at that! A Jew — even if he has sinned — is still a Jew! This man is steeped in all the abominations of this world, and yet, he is still concerned about a portion in Olom Habo!"

Rejoined the Chidushei HaRim, "Look at it this way. He still wants to indulge himself in all of the pleasures of this world but cannot derive the full enjoyment thereof so long as his conscience disturbs him and reminds him that he will have to pay for his sins in the World to Come. This is the reason why he demanded a guarantee that he receive a portion — only for the sake of being able to indulge himself all the more freely in all that his heart desires . . . "

(Sarfei Kodesh)


All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.