Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

11 Tishrei 5766 - October 15, 2005 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

OBSERVATIONS

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

HOMEPAGE

 

Produced and housed by
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Shema Yisrael Torah Network

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Observations


Observations: Simple Things that Hospitals Should Do
by Yated Ne'eman Staff

Recently available statistics gathered by the US federal government show that doctors and hospitals in the US fail with alarming frequency to deliver essential lifesaving treatments for some of the most common causes of death, including heart attack, pneumonia and heart failure.

The treatments are not controversial. Aspirin and beta blockers for a heart attack, antibiotics and immunizations for pneumonia, a simple test and drug for heart failure — are established, straightforward procedures. Yet they have proven difficult to deliver reliably in many hospitals.

"Hospitals are busy places, and doctors are fallible, and things will fall through the cracks, and they'll fall through the cracks a lot," said Ashish K. Jha of the Harvard School of Public Health, author of a study on hospitals' performance that appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine last month.

There is a 30 percent increase in the survival rate for patients who take aspirin in the first 24 hours after a heart attack. Yet hospitals in the US neglected to give aspirin to more than 12,000 people, one of every 16 heart attack victims, in the first half of 2004. Beta blockers also give big survival benefits, but one in eight patients who should have received them didn't.

Some hospitals said they were treating patients but just failing to document the treatment. But the American Hospital Association, doesn't agree.

"If the medications and tests are delivered and there's no documentation, that itself is a quality problem," said a spokesman.

The new numbers represent the first time all hospitals have publicly reported performance data. More than 3,500 hospitals are participating in the program, called Hospital Compare, in exchange for a bonus in Medicare payments.

Massachusetts led the states in basic heart attack care, delivering the appropriate therapy 97 percent of the time. Other New England states also performed better than most, as did some in the Northern Plains, like Minnesota and Montana.

Arkansas was last, with 85 percent compliance. Hawaii and Nevada were also low. Southern and far Western states tended to do less well on heart care measures.

Some hospitals had 100 percent compliance, but some were at 50 percent. St. Vincent Medical Center, a financially struggling 350-bed hospital in Los Angeles, delivered the appropriate care just 64 percent of the time.

Hospitals that did best realized they had problems, and systematically set out to fix them with checklists, patient safety rounds, even firings of administrators.

"We have zero tolerance for people not meeting these objectives," said an administrator in charge of quality for the chain that owns 350-bed Caritas St. Elizabeth Medical Center in Brighton, Mass. The hospital had 632 opportunities to deliver needed treatments to heart attack victims, the figures show. It did so 632 times.

 

All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.