Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

2 Iyar 5765 - May 11, 2005 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

OBSERVATIONS

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

EDITORIALS

HOMEPAGE

 

Produced and housed by
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Shema Yisrael Torah Network

Opinion & Comment
Politica
The Rise and Fall of Natan Sharansky

By E. Rauchberger

Minister of Social, Diaspora and Jerusalem Affairs Natan Sharansky resigned from the government last week due to the disengagement plan, saying it goes against his conscience. Since Sharansky was not a Knesset member, the resignation was a particularly notable move for now he essentially remains outside of the political arena. Many say that his absence will be hardly noticed because he has long since faded from the political map.

When he was liberated as part of a prisoner exchange between the East and the West, the world was breathless. In 1996 his party, Yisrael Ba'aliya, was the big surprise of the election, grabbing seven mandates in its first election run.

After defeating Peres by a hair due in large part to Sharansky's backing, Netanyahu paid handsomely, making Sharansky Minister of Trade and Commerce, Yuli Edelstein Minister of Immigration and Absorption, two other party members deputy ministers and appointing others to several important committees.

Sharansky had to overcome his first crisis during that first term when Uri Stern and Michael Nudelman resigned to form an independent list that later joined Avigdor Lieberman.

In the 1999 elections between Netanyahu and Barak, Sharansky managed to retain six mandates, but there was a crucial difference: he remained neutral. Netanyahu begged for his backing—even on the morning of the election—but Sharansky held out. Recognizing Sharansky's neutrality helped him win office under Barak too, who rewarded him with a portfolio, the Interior Ministry, after taking it away from Shas.

Sharansky also served as Deputy Prime Minister, but that marked the height of his career. From there it was all downhill.

Soon after the 1999 elections Roman Bronfman and another MK resigned from the party, leaving Yisrael Ba'aliya with just four mandates. This move was a real blow to Sharansky and the party since Barak then refused to give them any ministries, meaning Yuli Edelstein had to be content with an appointment as deputy minister. The formation of Lieberman's immigrant party, Yisrael Beiteinu, delivered a second blow.

Sharansky's real decline began in the last elections when Yisrael Ba'aliya received just two mandates, making it the smallest party in the Knesset. The vote was an indication Sharansky was nearing the end of his political career and perhaps that there is no longer room for an immigrant party in Israeli politics. The majority of immigrants voted either Likud for its right-wing stances or Shinui for its anti- religious stances, sending a message they can get along just fine with regular Israeli parties.

Gesture to Bush

Following Yisrael Ba'aliya's big failure in the last elections, which left a gaping hole in the party bank account, Sharansky decided to disband the two-mandate party and merge with the Likud. Sharon supported the move, which brought his party to a whopping 40 mandates—exactly one- third of the Knesset.

As part of the agreement between the two parties Sharon made Sharansky Minister of Social, Diaspora and Jerusalem Affairs, a virtually meaningless post despite the long, fancy name.

After his appointment Sharansky ceded his seat as MK to the next in line on the Yisrael Ba'aliya list to maximize the involvement of Yisrael Ba'aliya people in political affairs based on simple math: three is more than two. Sharansky opposed the disengagement plan every step of the way, but unlike Lieberman, Alon and Landau, Sharon did not fire him for several reasons.

First, since he did not have a Knesset seat Sharansky had no opportunity to actually vote against the plan. Second, he posed no threat. Well past his peak, Sharansky was expected to disappear from the political scene following this term, so why fire him because of his political beliefs? Unlike Eitam, Lieberman, Alon and Landau, Sharansky did not threaten the majority support for disengagement, so why not let the nice Russian guy keep his ministerial post? Let him enjoy his Volvo and office bureau. Gezunter heit.

Third, Sharansky has a fan by the name of George Bush, who just so happens to be the president of the United States and Sharon wants to stay on his good side. On several occasions Bush has remarked that Sharansky's book is one of his personal favorites. Firing Sharansky would not be looked upon favorably by Sharon's friend in the White House.

Thus Sharansky kept his appointment long after other disengagement opponents had been given the boot, but eventually his conscience got the better of him and he handed in his resignation, making his absence from the political arena official.


All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.