| |||
|
IN-DEPTH FEATURES
Part II
Today, antisemitism has evolved into many strange,
irrational forms which continue to confound the experts. Is
antisemitism based on race? Religion? Political persuasion?
Envy of the Jews' success? The need for a scapegoat? The
Jews' bothersome presence among the nations? The Jews' nerve
to establish their own country? One savant's elaborate theory
after another explodes in the face of a new, virulent,
original form of antisemitism.
It is tricky to pinpoint modern-day Hamans and
"hamanitarian" organizations since they often disguise their
antisemitism behind ostensibly legitimate agendas and
concerns. They insist they are not -- perish the thought! --
antisemites. They just care about human rights/animal
rights/suppressed minorities/Israelýi occupation/usurpation
of resources/environmental damage, etc. Rarely does it take
more than a soft scratching under the surface to realize that
only when it comes to the Jews or Israel do these modern-day
hamanitarians suddenly become indignant about human or animal
rights.
The first part of this article discussed the United
Nations, and also surveyed Arab Hate Groups, Right- wing,
Christian and White Supremacy Groups, and Black and Muslim
Groups. This part discusses governmental and institutional
antisemitism.
Government and Institutional
Antisemitism
More insidious and dangerous than the white and black U.S.
racist groups or Arab organizations is the latent
institutional and governmental antisemitism which has gained
respectability in Europe and America. Those who claim to be
advocates of freedom, tolerance, and equality are suddenly
propounding unabashedly antisemitic views. It is almost
viewed as the new vogue, the de rigueur philosophy of today's
high society and educated class.
In this category are European governments, animal rights
groups, university administrations and student unions, the
media and various medical and professional associations.
ANSWER Anti-War Coalition
The anti-war rallies of the past year were organized by the
International ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism)
Coalition. Originally created to protest the bombing of
Afghanistan, ANSWER has since organized many rallies which
included significant anti-Israel propaganda, including claims
that Israel is guilty of "war crimes" against Palestinians
and that Israel is a "racist state." The group was
responsible for last year's largest anti-Israel rally, the
"National March for Palestine Against War and Racism" in
Washington on April 20, 2002, which served as a forum for
supporting violence and terror organizations, and a
proliferation of antisemitic expression.
ANSWER has played a key role in bringing Arab and Muslim
groups into the anti-war and anti-racism movements, which has
led to extreme invective against Israel during protests.
It completely ignores the documented Palestinian war crimes
such as targeting civilians and using antipersonnel weapons
(adding screws to bombs), as well as the very idea of
targeting civilians which is the basis of the Palestinian
suicide bomber campaign and is clearly criminal under
international law. Israel never targets civilians.
European Anti-Jewish Legislation
Holland has initiated, and Switzerland has stiffened, anti-
shechita legislation which prevents Jews from
slaughtering meat according to Jewish law. Norway and Sweden
have had anti-shechita legislation on their books for
decades. (Sweden last year also passed a law forbidding
circumcision practiced by a religious functionary who is not
a doctor.)
While this anti-Jewish legislation was passed under the guise
of concern about cruelty to animals, the historical record
shows that anti-shechita laws often precede an
antisemitic purge against local Jews. One of the first steps
in the Nazi's antisemitic measures was instituting a ban on
the kosher slaughter of animals.
"They simply don't want Jews," said Rabbi Michael Melchior,
former chief rabbi of Norway. "I won't say this is the only
motivation, but I know that during the original debate on
this issue in Norway, where shechita has been banned
since 1930, one of the parliamentarians said straight out,
`If they don't like it, let them go live somewhere else.'"
The national director of the Anti-Defamation League in the US
said that bans on kosher slaughter are the result of activism
on the part of animal-rights extremists "aided and abetted"
by antisemitic politicians. "The key is whether or not there
is a history in that country. . . What other issues of animal
rights have they engaged in to prohibit cruelty? When they
begin and end with kosher slaughter, that's when I become
suspect."
Even in those countries where anti-Jewish legislation was not
passed, a huge rise in hundreds of percents of vandalism and
attacks against Jews has been noted, with only a lukewarm
response from law enforcement authorities. This is true in
France, Germany, Belgium and Holland. Authorities refuse to
admit that the Jews were specially targeted and claim that
the violence was regular vandalism.
European Union
The European Union has had an agenda that pressures Israel to
make continuous concessions to the PA at the same time that
it supports the corrupt PA regime through regular lavish
funding. No accountability or auditing is demanded from the
PA. For years the EU funded terrorism-preaching school
textbooks, while insisting it has no mechanism to critique
the books. Amazingly, the lethargy vanishes when it comes to
motions condemning Israel.
The EU has promoted and funded a host of left-wing
associations which lobby to help shrink Israel's borders and
promote a kid glove approach to PA violence whose terrorist
arm has been active with deadly efficiency over more than two-
and-a-half years.
EU High Commissioner Chris Patten refused to found a
committee to investigate what the PA is doing with EU
funding, despite being furnished proof by the IDF that the PA
was funneling much of their money to acts of terrorism. A
petition recently signed by EU parliamentarians at the
initiative of French representative Francois Zimeray may
force Patten to establish such a committee.
The EU has continually tried to interfere in Israel's private
affairs by sending in international interlopers and coercing
new variations of the failed Oslo agreement, such as the
latest "Roadmap for Peace," on Israel. They have also funded
nonprofit organizations that work within Israel for the
political goals they advocate, and also reward the
politicians who work towards their goals.
College Campuses
It's getting harder for even non-Orthodox Jews to study on
college campuses in the light of the rabid antisemitic
climate which pervades most college campuses today.
MESA
The Middle East Studies Association, the body which unites
professors of Middle East Studies in universities throughout
the U.S., is overwhelmingly pro- Palestinian and anti-
Israel.
At a recent MESA convention in Washington D.C. attended by
over 2,000 experts, U.S. representative David Satterfield was
booed by an enraged audience when he said the Palestinians
would have no future unless they renounce terrorism. The
conference plenary session focused on Israel, as did a
"special panel" earlier in the day featuring a speaker from
the notorious anti- Zionist organization, International
Solidarity Movement.
The Ottawa Citizen reports, "While there was hardly a
peep about oppression of Arabs by Arabs in the Middle East,
and whatever papers did touch on radical Islam were technical
and heavy with jargon, the academic fog miraculously cleared
when Israel came up. The professors were studiously detached,
even dry, when discussing Osama bin Laden, but full of
righteous passion on the subject of Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon."
Covert Anti-Israel Bias in Campus Faculties
Many professors whose field of expertise is unrelated to the
Middle East conflict or even history, flaunt their anti-
Israel bias. A first year student from a traditional Jewish
home studying in Berkeley University, was in a state of shock
after the class in which he was studying calmly compared
Israel with the Nazis. At Columbia University, lecturers have
cancelled classes to participate in pro-Palestinian
demonstrations.
Israeli academics who taught this past year at American
universities were surprised at the strength of the anti-
Israeli propaganda. Dr. Liora Brosh, who teaches comparative
literature at a New York State University college, says that
since September 11, the academic year was "a nightmare. An
entire year of attacks, even in the corridors, even in staff
meetings and conferences. There are posters hanging calling
for action against Israel, courses on the `narrative' of the
Palestinian struggle. There is an unquestioned assumption
apparently that Israel and the Israelis are the bad guys and
it is all presented in academic language that is supposed to
be neutral and supposedly free of political positions."
Literature Professor Dan Meron also says that very harsh anti-
Israeli propaganda is disseminated in academia. "This is
propaganda that comes wrapped in an academic hue, as an
intellectual attack against the state of Israel."
Professor Moshe Idel, a lecturer in Jewish thought at the
Hebrew University, taught at a number of American
universities during the past year. "In American academia
there is a demonization of Israel. At lunch they would talk
about the 500 killed in Jenin as if it were a fact. At least
50 percent of the people bought the Arab propaganda, and even
when the facts became known, no one retracted anything he had
said."
A vehemently anti-Israel five-day seminar whose purported
purpose was to educate Connecticut public school teachers
about the Middle East was hosted by Central Connecticut State
University (CCSU) where anti- Israel rhetoric, false
statements and propaganda were packaged as education to
scores of public school teachers. Among the agenda taught by
self-loathing Jew Dr. Norton Mezvinsky, an American history
teacher, is that Judaism is a cult religion, the Jewish
people have minimal historic connection with Israel, and the
Hebrews were a collection of outlaws.
Student Antisemitism
Not surprisingly, the students are following the example of
the professors and the administration, and have been
promoting antisemitism and anti-Israel agendas in student
publications.
For instance, Rutgers' Daily Targum quoted on April 5,
2002 an Arab student claiming that the Israeli government
went into an all-female hospital and randomly selected 30
women, called them terrorists and executed them. Although it
was obvious this was a pure fabrication, the Rutgers Daily
Targum allowed the claim to stand unchallenged.
UCLA's Daily Bruin wrote (April 15, 2002) that Iraq
and Israel equally violate international and humanitarian
laws and both Prime Minister Sharon and President Hussein are
accused of ordering the deaths of thousands of innocent
people.
Boston University's Daily Free Press wrote in the same
month that a group of student organizations used the occasion
of Holocaust Remembrance Day to publicize what they
considered to be Israeli aggression against its Arab
population. "These students labeled Israel an oppressive
apartheid state and even went so far as to justify the recent
spate of suicide bombings."
Media Demonization
The demonization of Israel has been spearheaded by major
world media, chief among them CNN and BBC. Not surprising,
the head of CNN, Ted Turner, is closely affiliated with the
UN.
CNN's anti-Israel bias in its approach to reporting on the
Middle East is found at all levels, and contains numerous
distortions and omissions. However it seems to be more
pervasive in the field, and less so at the Atlanta
headquarters.
The European media is no better. The collective British media
was the winner of HonestReporting organization's "Dishonest
Reporting Award for the Year 2002" for its hook, line and
sinker acceptance of the Palestinian version of a "massacre"
in Jenin this past April which was in keeping with its
regular anti-Israel slant.
All those who investigated agreed that only about fifty were
killed in the fight in Jenin (the IDF lost 23) and almost all
of them were fighters. Even the final Palestinian Authority
figure was 66 dead.
The London Independent compared Jenin to the Killing
Fields of Pol Pot's Cambodia where between 1 million to 3
million people were slaughtered from 1975 to 1978. The story
did not cite or quote a single Israeli source. An astonishing
number of reports of alleged massacres and atrocities even in
the "quality" newspapers of the British press cited the same
single Palestinian eyewitness for their allegations, and did
not solicit or report Israeli reactions to the charges.
The London Evening Standard accused the Israelis,
without any credible evidence, of poisoning Palestinian water
supplies. United Press International said that their article
would have been at home in the pages of a Nazi propaganda
sheet.
Others commented on the destruction that took place, and it
was a devastation. However the reason is that the Palestinian
fighters insist on staying in civilian areas, in violation of
the international laws of warfare. A very significant amount
of the destruction was caused by Palestinian bombs and booby
traps. And, at the end, of the 1100 homes in the refugee camp
near Jenin, 95 were destroyed. The town of Jenin was not
disturbed except by the noise.
Despite the fact that even the United Nations and Human
Rights Watch found that the IDF had carried out nothing near
a massacre when fighting the terrorists in Jenin, British
reporters made the following statements, among others:
- Israel's actions in Jenin were "every bit as repellent" as
Osama bin Laden's attack on New York on September 11. --
The Guardian
- "We are talking here of massacre, and a cover-up, of
genocide . . . " -- London Evening Standard
- "Rarely, in more than a decade of war reporting from
Bosnia, Chechnya, Sierra Leone, Kosovo, have I seen such
deliberate destruction, such disrespect for human life." --
The Times of London
- "Hundreds of victims 'were buried by bulldozer in a mass
grave'." -- Daily Telegraph
The antisemitic invective continues to be subtly conveyed in
the European newspapers' columns daily.
National Geographic
This monthly which purports to teach appreciation of the
world and nature, has consistently shown an anti- Israel and
pro-Palestinian bias when writing articles that concern
Israel.
For instance, "Lines in the Sand: Deadly Times in the West
Bank and Gaza," in its October 2002 edition was filled with
blatant historical inaccuracies, distortions and anti-Israel
dogma. Israel is depicted as either directly or indirectly
guilty for the Arab- Israeli conflict, while Arab aggression
is almost entirely omitted.
Human Rights Organizations
One might expect better from human rights' organizations, but
it turns out they are very selective concerning which humans
should get rights.
Amnesty International
This human rights watchdog has consistently criticized Israel
for efforts it makes in self-defense. In its annual report
last April, Amnesty International said Israel is guilty of
war crimes and it accuses the Israel Defense Forces of
causing "extensive damage to property with no apparent
military necessity and serious violations including . . .
extrajudicial executions." It bizarrely held up the fact that
there were so few corpses during the Jenin massacre as proof
that Israel had covered up its "war crimes."
World Medical Association
This world organization almost ousted its affiliate Israel
Medical Association because of the ongoing political campaign
against Israel. On the agenda of its annual meeting in Geneva
last year, the WMA discussed charges against Israel. No other
countries were singled out, though there is certainly plenty
more that could be said about violations of human rights in
other countries.
The WMA's member organizations represent millions of
physicians around the world -- including those in Egypt,
Syria, and other Moslem countries such as Indonesia and
former Soviet republics -- whose home countries have a
horrific human rights record.
The WMA's second-highest official and IMA chairman Dr. Yoram
Blachar took a large amount of written and audiovisual
material to defend Israel.
The antagonism towards Israel was clear at the meeting in
Vienna of the European Forum of the European Medical
Associations, part of the World Health Organization. Critical
resolutions were introduced by the Swedish and British
delegations, but they did not pass because they required
unanimity.
IMA members and affiliated specialists' societies such as the
Israel Pediatrics Society and the Israel Cardiology Society
have regularly fielded criticism from counterparts abroad.
International Committee of the Red Cross
Since the early 1970s, the International Committee of the Red
Cross has designated Israel's settlements as "war crimes" and
this has constituted its basis for opposition to Israeli
"occupation" and "settlement." The decisions of the ICRC's
board are made in secret, without any due process.
The ICRC's history with relation to Jews is nothing to be
proud of. During World War II, it was reluctant to
investigate concentration camps, massacres, brutality and
human-rights abuses against Jews. When it did visit some of
the camps, its reports whitewashed Nazi atrocities. During
the war, the Red Cross failed miserably to help POWs and
inmates of concentration camps.
After the war, the ICRC was a major conduit for high- ranking
Nazis to escape Europe. The Red Cross provided false
passports, for example, to the commandants of Treblinka and
Sobibor concentration camps, and enabled Alois Brunner,
Eichmann's assistant, to escape to Damascus.
The ICRC refuses to authorize the Jewish star symbol of the
Magen David Adom even though it qualifies in every other way.
The ICRC did authorize a red lion especially for Iran.
American Red Cross president Hernadine Healy was forced out
of her job partly because of her withholding administrative
dues from the international organization for not accepting
Israel's symbol.
When Red Crescent facilities and vehicles are used in attacks
against Jews, the ICRC is silent. On March 10, 2003, a Red
Crescent ambulance driver was charged with using a Red
Crescent ambulance to transport weapons to terrorists of the
Fatah. He transported guns and an explosive belt. In order to
disguise the weapons, including a volatile explosive belt,
Jibril asked a doctor and his brother's wife and children to
accompany him and masquerade as sick people, endangering them
all. The ambulance was a vehicle of cruelty and not a vehicle
of mercy.
YMCA
The World Alliance of YMCAs was established in 1855 and is
headquartered in Geneva. This coordinating body that brings
together 122 National YMCA movements from all over the world
has passed numerous anti-Israel resolutions, replete with
biased terminology like "Israeli Occupation Forces,"
"Liberated Palestinian Territories" and "Palestine." The 12th
World Council attested to the fact that the World Alliance
supports the Palestinians by "asking member movements to make
representations to their governments on behalf of the
Palestinian people." Further Councils have passed similar
resolutions.
Distortions and falsehoods abound in reports and resolutions
adopted following the outbreak of the current round of
Palestinian violence in September 2000. For example, a report
entitled "Responding to the Second Intifadah: Crisis in
Palestine Deepens" notes that a YMCA facility was hit by
Israeli gunfire but never mentions that it came in response
to incessant Palestinian fire against Israeli residential
apartments in the Jerusalem residential neighborhood of Gilo.
Responding to attacks is legal under international law, but
targeting noncombatant areas is not.
An International YMCA/YWCA observer charged "to investigate
conditions in Palestine and Israel and report back" submitted
20 reports, none of which deal with the suffering inflicted
by Palestinian terrorists on Israeli civilians. All the
reports deal only with Palestinian hardship, and blame is
assigned solely to Israel.
The East Jerusalem branch of the YMCA has launched a "Free
Palestine" campaign to press for Israeli withdrawal and the
Palestinian right of return. Advertisements for the campaign
are carried in Palestinian publications such as the February
2003 issue of the EU-funded This Week in Palestine.
Recognizing the highly politicized and inaccurate positions
of the World Alliance, the YMCA of the USA, YMCA Canada, and
the Mexican Federation of YMCAs issued strongly worded
protests prior to the World Council meeting in Mexico last
July. However, the US, Canada, and Mexican Federation's
statements are nowhere to be found on the World Alliance's
site.
American Library Association
Since the 1980s a hard-core group of librarians within the
American Library Association have been pushing for Israel's
segregation and expulsion. These form the membership of the
ALA's so-called "Social Responsibilities Round Table," the
SRRT, who have written articles and passed resolutions
censuring Israel and calling for its annihilation. Their
proposals have been in the main passed by the ALA Council,
which has condemned no other nation with anywhere near the
frequency and vitriol it has reserved for Israel.
In the special resolution which they passed in their June
2002 convention, they deplored the destruction of
"Palestinian computers, photocopiers, books, audio
recordings, video recordings, data, institutional archives
and records, and objects of historical, cultural, and
artistic importance" since it "represents a significant loss
for the Palestinian people and the world."
They ignored the fact that PA libraries are packed with
Holocaust denial and calls for genocide, ethnic cleansing and
Jihad against Jews.
An anti-Israel resolution passed in 1992 protested "the
deportation of our colleague Omar al-Safi, a librarian at Bir
Zeit University, in the Israeli-Occupied West Bank." Al-Safi
is a convicted felon, with a long and violent criminal
record. He is a member and recruiter for the Democratic Front
for the Liberation of Palestine, a terrorist group which
perpetrated the Maalot school attack in which 22 Israeli
children were slain. Al-Safi, by the way, was never deported
by Israel.
The ALA also invited to its 1992 convention Khader Hamide, a
member of and fundraiser for the Popular Front for the
Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). The PFLP gained particular
notoriety in the 1970s for gunning down civilians in airports
and hijacking commercial passenger planes around the world,
including the 1972 Japanese Red Army machine-gun rampage at
Ben-Gurion (formerly Lod) Airport, which butchered over 25.
Recently, it took credit for Tourism Minister Ze'evi's
assassination.
*
Surveying this comprehensive list of antisemitic
organizations should ready us for our national night of
freedom on Pesach night. When we stand up and recite "In
every generation they stand up to destroy us," we should stop
a moment and reflect on this grim list to appreciate what
we're saying, and this list is by no means exhaustive.
And after that, let us not forget to take a deep breath of
gratitude and say with all our heart, "It is only Hakodosh
Boruch Hu Who saves us from their hands!"
|
All material
on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.