Opinion
& Comment
Politica
Jewish Religious Services Authority
by E. Rauchberger
The Religious Councils across the country are collapsing.
Many rabbonim and employees have not been getting paid, some
of them for months already. Not a single council is meeting
the need for religious services. Jerusalem residents were
shocked to learn the Religious Council would no longer be
able to maintain the city's mikvo'os due to large
debts to fuel oil providers.
The coalition agreement between Shinui and the Mafdal
contains a paragraph stating, "The Religious Councils will
cease to exist in their present form" and, "a professional
team will draft an amendment to ensure and regulate the
provision of Jewish religious services through other means
(based primarily on municipal services). The team is to
complete its task within six months."
Almost six months have passed since the government was set
up, yet no conclusions have been tabled for legislation. For
now the Deputy Minister of Religious Affairs has been making
moves as he sees fit, primarily in accordance with the
Mafdal's political interests. Religious councils run by
Mafdal figures are given priority in solving budgetary
problems, while religious councils run by Shas figures are
given priority for closure and are merged with other
religious councils--due to budgetary problems, of course.
The Shinui-Mafdal agreement does not specify how religious
services will be provided, except for the vague reference to
municipal services, i.e. transferring religious services to
the budget of the local councils. Presumably this means the
local council would open a section or department to provide
religious services, just as there are departments for
culture, sanitation, social services, etc.
This is the worst idea possible. When a given city faces a
budget crisis and the Interior Ministry demands it cut costs
as part of its recovery, any mayor would invariably start
slashing religious services first. How concerned are the
mayors of Tel Aviv, Herzliya, Be'er Sheva or Nes Tziona over
issues such as kashrus, eiruvin, shechitoh, nisuin,
and the like?
Even local councils with active, dominant national-religious
or chareidi representatives will always be worried what
tomorrow might bring, for the balance of the coalition could
change at any time. A new mayor could come along and these
same active, dominant representatives could find themselves
in the opposition.
In a preliminary vote during the previous Knesset, MK Rabbi
Moshe Gafni succeeded in passing a bill to set up a special
government authority for Jewish religious services to replace
the religious councils. Just as there is a Ports and Railway
Authority and an Airports Authority, there would also be an
authority responsible for providing religious services for
all of the State of Israel's Jewish citizens.
Among the obstacles the proposal has faced is staunch
opposition by Shas, which held the Religious Affairs Ministry
portfolio until not long ago. Then the religious councils
provided the party a source of political appointments, just
like the Mafdal before it, until eventually Shas gained
complete control over the Ministry.
But now that the Mafdal has the upper hand in the Religious
Affairs Ministry, Shas is unlikely to continue opposing this
bill as forcefully as in the past. Their main ambition is for
the present arrangement to remain until their hopes for a
change in the current political situation are realized,
bringing them back to power in the Religious Affairs Ministry
and through it, in the local councils as well. But since
these hopes now seem highly unlikely and since Shinui seems
to be resolute in its intentions to implement all parts of
the agreement related to the religious councils, perhaps Shas
will agree to compromise on the setup of an authority for
Jewish religious services, or at least voice less forceful
opposition.
Before the summer recess began Rabbi Gafni tabled his bill a
second time. He is well aware that as a member of the
opposition it will be very difficult for him to advance the
proposal, but it could well be that when the government
presents a proposal on the matter of the religious councils,
this idea can be raised for consideration among the
alternatives presented to Knesset members. And who knows?
Perhaps this proposal will be the one to capture the hearts
of the majority.
All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use. |