| |||
|
IN-DEPTH FEATURES
As the senior member of the largest party on the Jerusalem
City Council, Rabbi Uri Lupoliansky took over as mayor when
Ehud Olmert resigned to become a Cabinet minister in
February. Now he is running for a full term in elections to
be held on June 3-3 Sivan.
Rabbi Uri Lupoliansky has now served for three months as head
of the biggest municipality in Israel, a very prestigious
post by all standards and also a very meaningful one.
Jerusalem became the fifth city headed by Degel HaTorah party
members, joining Bnei Brak Mayor Rabbi Mordechai Karelitz,
Beitar Illit Mayor Rabbi Yitzchok Pindrus, Modi'in Illit
Mayor Rabbi Yaakov Guterman and Kiryat Yearim (Telzstone)
Council Head Rabbi Avrohom Rosenthal.
A review of these other four towns and cities shows each of
them is run commendably in all respects, as demonstrated by
the great esteem all of the chareidi mayors have earned from
the ranks of the central government. The new Mayor of
Jerusalem has several role models to learn from and high
expectations to meet. But he need not rely on these
colleagues to teach him how to manage a municipality--except,
perhaps, for a few good tips--since he himself comes to the
post with almost fifteen years of experience at the Jerusalem
Municipality.
Ehud Olmert left the mayor's office to begin a new job as
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Industry, Trade and
Employment. Seeking a top post in the national government,
Olmert had run in the Likud primaries, helped Ariel Sharon
set up his Likud-Shinui- Mafdal government, signed an
agreement with Yosef Lapid and Effi Eitam to change the
status quo on religious matters (an agreement that has
already been violated) and settled for Industry in lieu of
Finance, the much more prestigious post he had pinned his
hopes on. Olmert was a secular person but he had worked with
the chareidim for about a decade in Jerusalem, since he
unseated former mayor Teddy Kollek who ran the city for 27
years.
At first the media was hardly fond of the idea of a chareidi
mayor for one of Israel's major cities. The newspapers flung
barbs and insults, running headlines such as "The City Will
Turn Chareidi," "Secularists Will Flee Jerusalem" and one
that greatly angered Lupoliansky, "The Chareidim are Upon
You, Jerusalem."
However, after he took office the city continued to run just
as before. Even the rush-hour traffic jams, particularly at
the entrance to the city, are the same. Nobody is running out
of town. A few days later critical opinion columns changed
direction, and even without the headlines, city residents can
sense the positive change that has taken place.
Suddenly the man-eating chareidi baiters, accustomed to
sullying and slandering the chareidi public at every
opportunity, discovered that having a chareidi mayor was not
so terrible after all. He runs the city smoothly and has not
coerced anyone. Now the general public is beginning to get
used to the idea of a chareidi mayor in Jerusalem. The polls
have begun to shine on Lupoliansky and he definitely has a
good chance to win, perhaps in the first round, or perhaps in
a runoff.
Before Pesach, about two months after the former deputy mayor
in charge of planning and construction took over the mayor's
office, Yated Ne'eman met with Rabbi Uri Lupoliansky
for an extended interview.
Yated Ne'eman: How do you feel in your new post?
Rabbi Uri Lupoliansky: It's a different world. It is a
big responsibility. A reporter from England asked me in an
interview, "You work hard, but you worked hard before, too.
What has changed?"
I told him that before I would pray as well, but I always
prayed just for my own family. Now I get up in the morning
and pray for the well-being of Jerusalem and its residents.
Not out of righteousness but because of the responsibility.
So that with siyata deShmaya everything will be
alright, that nothing will happen, that it will be calm and
quiet in Jerusalem. This is out of a sense of responsibility
and it touches all areas.
There are regular meetings with the District Chief on various
matters, meetings with high-ranking military officers on
security matters, with economic heads on economic matters and
matters of future development. It's a whole different
world.
For example, I was asked for my opinion on the policy of
continuing to carry gas masks [during the latter part of the
war in Iraq]. I said I am not an expert on security matters,
but I can only repeat what Chazal say that one should not
issue decrees the public cannot uphold. Could everyone be
expected to walk around with a gas mask? That would be
virtually impossible unless it was for a short period of
time. If you were to tell people to carry the masks for two
days that would be reasonable, but to expect them to carry
them constantly only makes people negligent. As a result
those who adhered to such a directive would be considered
aberrant and then other people would not follow suit.
YN.: Is your gas mask kit with you?
R' Lupoliansky: I don't have it on, but it's in the
car.
In short my job is not just about whether to install a swing
in the playground or not, but much more. It requires a great
deal of siyata deShmaya and boruch Hashem I
have someone to take my questions. I consult Maran HaRav
Eliashiv shlita on every step I take. The outcome of
these consultations has consequences that embrace all issues.
There are many issues that are not directly connected to the
municipality or to the mayor, but I am briefed every day on
danger levels, security warnings, and so naturally many
things make their way to the mayor's desk.
YN: So you are working harder than in the past.
R' Lupoliansky: Yom volaylo lo yishbosu.
YN: Do you get less sleep?
R' Lupoliansky: Definitely. It's unbelievable. I used
to think there is a mayor and there are deputy mayors and the
mayor works a bit harder than his deputies. It turns out that
the mayor's office is a whole different world. There's no
comparison.
YN: Would you compare the task of Jerusalem mayor to
that of a government minister?
R' Lupoliansky: Certainly.
YN: Do you feel a greater sense of responsibility than
a government minister?
R' Lupoliansky: Definitely, because a minister does
not have a direct tie with the residents while the mayor is
directly tied to the residents' problems.
The Media Settles Down
YN: Regarding the City Council elections scheduled for
the third of Sivan, are you concerned Shinui will send
secular voters to the polls with a scare tactic of "the
chareidim plan to take over the city?"
R' Lupoliansky: No. Today nearly 40 percent of the
voters have declared their support. This means there are
plenty of people in the city to make it hard to wage a public
discrimination campaign against them. In fact, if they try
that it would bring greater support among the majority of the
population, which does not tolerate de-legitimizing an
individual because of his identity.
YN: Why did the media try to scare the public before
you took office?
R' Lupoliansky: It began with the anti-chareidi
campaign, "the chareidim are upon you, Jerusalem" [a
reference to a newspaper headline, see above]. Suddenly they
saw the public was not behind them and that they were
exaggerating.
YN: Some claim our needs would be better met by a
secular mayor who wields political power rather than a
chareidi mayor who would constantly be tested to see how he
is doing with regard to his secular constituents.
R' Lupoliansky: You have to know how to go about doing
things. The public knows that the chareidi sector has needs,
too. The question is do you ask for a bit here and a bit
there, in a patchwork manner, or do you ask for a future
solution for the totality of needs-- and all segments of the
city's population have needs.
Until now the approach taken was problematic and this needs
to be remedied. I would like to see a new norm established
and a foundation built for the future, not from one day to
the next as it has been done in the past.
Thousands of New Apartments
YN: You must be aware of the fact that during the last
ten years no new neighborhood has been built for the chareidi
sector.
R' Lupoliansky: Indeed. A neighborhood, no, but
thousands of new housing units have been built outside and
within existing neighborhoods. Boruch Hashem I was
able to make it possible for tens of thousands of chareidi
families to build additions to their apartments. This is a
radical change. The municipality used to oppose any expansion
of an apartment or adding a balcony. Today the situation is
that Jerusalem is known for improving the quality of life of
its residents by building onto existing housing.
YN: One building here and there?
R' Lupoliansky: Not one building here and there but
hundreds of buildings, since there was no good reason to
construct new neighborhoods with the need for new
infrastructures, rather than expanding existing
neighborhoods.
Now they are going to build a new neighborhood next to Ramot.
You have to understand what happens. In Jerusalem they used
to build remote neighborhoods. We came and said, "This was an
idea you thought up back then and now we need to develop in
between the neighborhoods. We'll [expand] the existing
infrastructures in the neighborhoods themselves, i.e. the
botei knesses, mikvo'os, schools, kindergartens
and nursery schools. This was how we built thousands of
housing units in chareidi neighborhoods without making a lot
of noise and without having to invest in infrastructure.
YN: Were these private initiatives?
R' Lupoliansky: Not at all. For example, the plan for
the new Har Nof, the plan for Givat Shaul [past the
industrial area], the plan surrounding Sanhedria and the
plan for Antennae Hill [in Bayit Vegan]. Thousands of housing
units will be built in these areas.
YN: Yet they are not yet being built yet.
R' Lupoliansky: This is a question of necessity. The
plans are finished and have been thoroughly prepared, and
this was the initiative of the city. Take, for example, the
new housing development adjacent to Har Nof [to be named
after HaRav Shach zt'l]. It contains 2,200 housing
units. In Ramat Shlomo alone there are 2,000 housing units
and another plan in the works for a major addition of 800
housing units to be built in the near future. So why should I
build another neighborhood far away?
There has not been an increase in housing prices and this
stems in part from the large number of extensions we did.
Over the years we have also built through the Authority for
Jerusalem Development, Moriah and private contractors. We
have plans for thousands more housing units and when they are
needed we will build them. I really hope that at least for
part of them there will be substantial assistance from the
government and the Ministry of Housing.
Demographic Catastrophe on the Horizon
YN: What is being done about the massive flight of
young couples--both chareidi and secular--from Jerusalem?
R' Lupoliansky: That is the main question. If the
State does not make a fundamental change (and you should
realize we are nearing a demographic catastrophe), if money
is not invested to allow people to live here--not only to
prevent people from leaving Jerusalem, but to draw them from
other places--then within twenty years there will not be a
Jewish majority in Jerusalem. If the government does not
recognize this and take action in this matter, it will be
terrible.
YN: What should the government do?
R' Lupoliansky: If Beitar Illit, Modi'in Illit and Tel
Tzion receive assistance through government mortgage loans
(which are now being seriously cut back) and funding for
development costs because of right-wing political thinking,
this shows government ideology to promote settling these
places. But there was a major oversight here. They should
have brought Jerusalem into this same ideological thinking.
If the City of Jerusalem does not receive easy mortgage
loans, this [the flight of young families] is the result.
YN: In Jerusalem, apartments are more expensive than
in other cities . . .
R' Lupoliansky: Every location has its price, and
certainly prices of the apartments in Jerusalem cannot be
like the prices in the rest of the country, if only for the
costs of the land and its development [excavating into rock,
in an urban area, etc.] and covering the buildings with
Jerusalem stone [which is required by a local ordinance].
YN: The same applies in Beit Shemesh and Beitar Illit
where buildings are faced with Jerusalem stone.
R' Lupoliansky: True, but you cannot compare the land
costs. In Beitar, for example, the State gives the land away
practically for free. In Jerusalem these lots belong to the
Israel Lands Authority, which can decide to give the lands in
programs which used to be called, "Bnei Beitcha"
[Build Your Own Apartment]. If the State of Israel invests in
development inside of Jerusalem, it will not lose
economically. Maybe it will not generate a profit. But if the
government doesn't come to its senses soon in Jerusalem, it
stands to lose for generations to come. Am Yisroel will lose.
It will be catastrophic here.
YN: So instead of repairing the broken bridge they
build a hospital next to the bridge [i.e. they just try to
fix problems but not avoid them]--is that the meaning of the
expansion of the municipal area of Jerusalem?
R' Lupoliansky: Part of the matter is long-term,
expanding the municipal area in order to make it possible for
us to build more. Attaching existing neighborhoods in the
west does not have any special demographic significance
because the existing residents west of the city do not add so
many people. The plan was formulated mainly to make it
feasible to build more than 100,000 additional housing units
in Western Jerusalem.
YN: That would make Jerusalem gigantic. Someone would
be considered a resident of Jerusalem from a legal
standpoint, but in reality he would be living a considerable
distance away, in some neighborhood annexed to the city.
R' Lupoliansky: I foresee construction extending all
the way to these locations. Like the more distant
neighborhoods we have in the city today. I hope to see
construction in the wadi between Sanhedria and Ramat
Shlomo and between Ramat Shlomo and Ramot, as well as other
areas, for Jerusalem has mountains surrounding it. But there
are links between the neighborhoods and the intent is for
Jerusalem to become a metropolis, a central location. I hope
that there really will be intensive construction so Jerusalem
residents will be able to live here, along with new residents
coming from outside of the city. In my view there is no
alternative; this is what will have to happen. I just cannot
say what the time frame will be.
Alleviating Classroom Crowding
YN: How do you intend to solve the dire state of
classroom crowding in the chareidi sector?
R' Lupoliansky: The crisis is primarily in the
chareidi sector, but also applies in the Arab sector. Without
a doubt the problem is due to the large families in the city,
kein yirbu, and the State has not provided enough, has
not done enough. Boruch Hashem our sector has grown
incomparably. The State is not prepared for this.
One hundred percent of the financing for classroom
construction comes to the Education Ministry. The City
pressures and pressures to receive [additional classrooms].
The City does not build classrooms from its own budget.
Certainly several hundred classrooms are needed. I have been
sitting down with directors of the Education section in order
to try to set a three- year plan that, besiyata
deShmaya, will greatly alleviate the situation, more than
we are used to seeing.
YN: How do you explain the growing gap between the
number of students in the government education system and the
number of students in the chareidi education system?
R' Lupoliansky: There is no comparison between
families in the chareidi sector, which boruch Hashem
have larger families, and families in the secular sector.
Furthermore, the city's secular population is aging. Some of
their children have already left the city and as a result
facilities become available in such places. The same applies
in the schools.
Once upon a time there were no computer rooms in schools, no
classrooms for enrichment programs and no annex rooms. Today
a school building with eight classrooms has another four
annex rooms because this is what Education Ministry standards
require.
YN: How many classrooms is Jerusalem supposed to
receive from the Ministry of Education through Mifal Hapayis
funding?
R' Lupoliansky: We are supposed to construct several
large education campuses. The person primarily responsible
for this is Section Director Rabbi Binyamin Cohen, along with
Rabbi Dov Fox of the Administration for Chareidi Education,
which operates very nicely and professionally. I hope to see
construction begin within the next few months. However they
have yet to receive Finance Ministry approval for this
extensive project. But since I am on good terms with the
central government, although the situation is a bit
problematic, I hope it will work out.
Government Assistance for Jerusalem
YN: How do you get along with the Ministry of the
Interior, which Avraham Poraz of Shinui now heads? I heard
you have already managed to receive tens of millions of
shekels from him in the form of loans to the City.
R' Lupoliansky: I'm glad there is a separation between
politics and professional matters. One of the interesting
things is that even within this brief period I feel this
separation has been made, and personal ties play a part as
well.
YN: And how are your ties with other leading
government officials?
R' Lupoliansky: I have a good relationship with the
Prime Minister and with the Finance Minister.
YN: And with Industry Minister Ehud Olmert.
R' Lupoliansky: Certainly.
YN: Or has he already forgotten about Jerusalem?
R' Lupoliansky: No, he has not forgotten about
Jerusalem. I need his help on a certain matter now and I have
been in contact with him. This is a government that is very
unreasonable, but I tend to believe they will help Jerusalem,
nevertheless.
YN: Do you think they'll help because Jerusalem is
Jerusalem, or won't help because of the chareidi mayor?
R' Lupoliansky: They'll help because Jerusalem is
Jerusalem. They will not be able to disregard the city's
status.
YN: The City of Jerusalem has a huge deficit. How do
you intend to extricate the city from this economic
crisis?
R' Lupoliansky: The fact that the economic situation
is difficult definitely has an effect on everything. But if
everyone is living on an overdraft, the city can too. It's
not the end of the world.
YN: But we're talking about NIS 400 million [$90
million] deficit . . .
R' Lupoliansky: A deficit, just like anything else,
you need to know how to handle, and how to reduce the current
deficit in spite of long-term loans. It's clear to me that in
addition to efforts to avoid unnecessary bureaucracy we will
also be able to limit expenses and make the system more
efficient.
Improving Services
YN: When you assumed your post and you said you would
ask municipality workers to relate better to the public, both
the former mayor and the clerks were offended.
R' Lupoliansky: I didn't say it in that manner, but I
would like to tell you nobody should be offended by the idea
of providing better service. Improved service is a very
natural thing. And we have to reduce the number of employees
because some of them actually create work. Sometimes it is
better to give one person a salary raise rather than having
two people do the work. There are two things that need
changing: the human aspects and the physical aspects. In
terms of the human aspects, there has to be a recognition
that everyone in public service is here thanks to the city's
residents, municipal taxpayers, etc., who sent the
municipality employees here to serve them. Then the whole
matter changes. Therefore I think the municipality could use
a service pledge that within 48 hours the clerk will have to
carry out the task and give the person making the request or
inquiry a reply. Everyone will receive an immediate response.
The answer may be that the request cannot be carried out, but
even when we cannot provide services a reason should be
given. I also spoke of having all those who provide services
dress accordingly.
YN: A uniform, as is practiced in many other
countries, which would result in greater modesty?
R' Lupoliansky: Exactly. Everyone would wear a uniform
with the City of Jerusalem emblem and the employee's name.
This would prevent a lot of problems. People tried to
dissuade me by claiming there isn't enough money. I said I
would bring in contributions to cover it, and I did manage to
raise funds. And then I decided to raise funds for the
Courteous Worker program, in which every month the public
determines who was the most courteous worker. Everyone would
have a name plate beside him with feedback forms on every
desk. And the winning worker would receive a prize about
twice the size of a regular salary. If someone has a
disturbance near his home and contacts the municipality it
will have to be taken care of within three hours. If not the
worker will be reprimanded and perhaps even fired.
A lot of money has to be raised now from the government
ministries and from donations. Seventy roads will be laid in
the near future, sidewalks repaired, lighting improved,
neighborhood benches added.
YN: Where does the money come from?
R' Lupoliansky: Partly from donations.
YN: And do you need to take a trip abroad for this?
R' Lupoliansky: No. With today's communications you
can do this without flying abroad. I managed to raise several
million shekels from people to whom Jerusalem is important.
From these funds, together with government funds, we will
invest more in cleanliness, landscaping, playgrounds and all
this will be done right away to make living in the city
pleasant. Later this can serve as a step up in terms of [the
City's] attention to public areas and residents' needs. Every
mayor sees this from his own angle. A mayor who is an
accountant by profession sees everything in terms of dollars
and cents. My own turf is the human side.
In the past I applied pressure to rehabilitate public areas
and everyone has noticed the results. And in general the
service pledge will affect the entire population. My approach
is that instead of doing private favors for 15 people I
straighten out the problem for 15,000 people. In giving out
permits for apartment extensions we changed the course of
matters that used to be handled mainly with protexia.
The general question is whether to handle a problem by fixing
the system itself or just on an individual basis. You cannot
abandon the personal aspect, but if faced with a question of
whether to provide for three people asking for favors or to
address something on a system-wide level that will provide
assistance for 3,000 people, I prefer to address the 3,000
people.
YN: Jerusalem is the poorest city in Israel. How can
this be changed?
R' Lupoliansky: Action definitely has to be taken to
address this matter. I have a few ideas of my own. I don't
like to talk about ideas theoretically. I plan to carry them
out.
YN: Like what?
R' Lupoliansky: It's too early to discuss them, but
this is one of the needs that has to be met. Attention also
has to be given to the physical condition of the
neighborhoods and to do things to ease the burden for large
families. Among other [planned initiatives] we will issue
local-resident cards that will grant every family admission
to public sites at reduced prices so that the children--even
if the family's financial situation is not good--will also be
able to enjoy a wider range of possibilities.
YN: I imagine Uri Lupoliansky sees himself as a mayor
for five years since there's no reason to begin solving
problems for just the next two months. The idea you proposed
to improve service, for example, is a long- term solution.
YN: That doesn't mean anything. I am working in what I
am doing for now, not for the next five years. In every
situation I find myself I try to do the maximum, regardless
of what will happen later. I am putting order into various
systems so that these systems will also be viable another
five years from now, because I am trying to make changes in
the system that will have a positive effect for many years to
come, besiyata deShmaya.
Maintaining the Public Spaces
YN: In conclusion, you are aware of the fact that acts
of chilul Shabbos in the city have increased in recent
years.
R' Lupoliansky: This definitely pains all those who
perceive Jerusalem's kedushoh, even those who do not
keep Shabbos at home according to halocho. I know this from
close up, that the vast majority of residents in this city
want to see the city's public face as a special city
recognized for the holiness of its Shabbos.
Furthermore you have to realize people say the mayor has far-
reaching authority. I am told, "If you grant a building
permit for this building or that one, chilul Shabbos
will take place inside."
Do I grant permits to desecrate Shabbos? I grant a permit for
people to occupy a building and for the building to be lived
in as it should be. The municipality does not give anybody
permission to operate on Shabbos. The Labor Ministry does so.
Judge [Ayala] Procaccia determined that coffee houses,
restaurants and gas stations are allowed to operate on
Shabbos, but this has nothing to do with the municipality. We
are not a party to this. Granted there is a problem, but
there is one thing accepted by the silent majority, including
this city's non-religious population, and this is that
Jerusalem is unlike Israel's other cities. Jerusalem's public
face cannot be desecrated. There has to be a public face
appropriate to the holy city of Jerusalem and we are making
every effort in this matter.
YN: Thank you very much and good luck.
Who can forget the huge demonstrations against the
archaeological excavations at various sites around the city?
It has turned into a set ritual. Whenever ancient graves were
discovered on road -- or building -- construction sites the
battle against grave desecration was set into motion, though
in many cases the ordeal for both sides could have been
prevented.
Over a year ago Rabbi Uri Lupoliansky, then in charge of
municipal planning and construction, conceived an idea to
require contracting companies requesting construction permits
for roads or buildings to perform preliminary geological
testing to search for burial caves. The testing costs only a
few hundred or at most a few thousand shekels. The standard
technique is a fairly simple form of ultrasound tests--not
unlike those performed on humans--scanning underground in
order to detect hollow spaces. If subterranean cavities are
found the geologists ascertain whether there is indeed a
burial cave or merely a hole dug for other purposes or a
boulder with an empty space underneath. If it does prove to
be a burial cave, the road or building is simply moved a bit
to one side or the other.
This novel procedure is only followed in Jerusalem. Since the
proposal was implemented, there have hardly been any problems
with archaeological digging in the city. This is exactly how
problems are supposed to be solved: in advance, quietly,
without causing an uproar and grievances on all sides.
Particularly since the cost of testing is so low.
This is just one example of how a municipality as big as the
City of Jerusalem must operate. Many problems can be quietly
solved if small details are considered in advance. This
example may be a bit dated, but since Rabbi Lupoliansky has
assumed the post of mayor many people have already sensed a
change at the municipality and in the city itself.
Those representing the city's chareidi sector now have an
easier job. The positive reception they have been given
lately by municipal officials--from high-ranking officials to
simple clerks--has led them to wonder why things were
different in the past. "Everyone knows who the mayor is,"
explains Rabbi Lupoliansky, "and that I want everything to
have a different look in every area," a reference to
attitudes toward little things and to solving problems before
they arise. The issue of eruvin is a good example. At
first glance it would seem the municipality has nothing to do
with the wire eruv surrounding the city, which falls
under the responsibility of the Religious Council. Yet until
now, when contractors performed groundwork in various places
around the city they sometimes damaged the eruv wires
and poles inadvertently, not bothering to repair them. As a
result, Religious Council workers had to check the
eruv several times a week. Meanwhile, the same
contractors had to obtain a permit from and coordinate with
Israel Electric, Bezeq, the municipal water supplier and all
other companies whose infrastructures lie underground or
aboveground. To solve the problem, Mayor Lupoliansky recently
decided to add the eruv committee to the round of
obtaining permits and coordinating. Now if the eruv
gets damaged the Religious Council is notified immediately,
just like Bezeq, Israel Electric, etc.
Or take, for example, the issue of trash removal during the
strike a few weeks ago. It is no secret that chareidi
neighborhoods suffered much more from the piling up garbage.
Therefore the municipality decided that the moment the strike
ended, neighborhoods with large juvenile populations would be
cleared of garbage first.
During the heavy snowfall that blanketed Jerusalem during the
winter, Rabbi Lupoliansky joined city snow experts on
preliminary tours of the city and again on the night snow
levels began to reach considerable heights. Suddenly he
noticed, the road leading to Neve Yaakov was blocked.
Following a brief inquiry, he learned that this route was not
included among the "red roads" that lead to hospitals,
therefore the snow- blowers had not bothered to clear the
road.
"There are 17 births in the neighborhood every night," said
Rabbi Lupoliansky. "How do you expect birthing mothers to get
to the hospital?" he asked, and ordered that the road be
cleared immediately. Since then, it was decided the main road
to Neve Yaakov and all of the city's other outlying
neighborhoods would be kept open during snowstorms.
These are just a few examples to demonstrate that Jerusalem
now has a mayor who is on the job full-time, taking the minor
details into account and looking out for residents' needs.
Hopefully this change for the better will have an impact on
the City of Jerusalem's functioning for years to come.
| ||
All material
on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted. |