Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight
  

A Window into the Chareidi World

7 Nisan 5766 - April 4, 2006 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

OPINION
& COMMENT

OBSERVATIONS

HOME
& FAMILY

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

POPULAR EDITORIALS

HOMEPAGE

 

Produced and housed by
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
Shema Yisrael Torah Network

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NEWS
Bank of Israel: Israel Ranks Low in Caring for Elderly, Handicapped, Children and Underclass

by G. Lazer

A Bank of Israel report for 2005 reveals that in 2004 Israel ranked at the bottom of a survey of social security entitlements in developed nations. In old-age benefits Israel ranked 19th of 23 countries and in child allowances it was second to last, with only Spain falling further behind.

According to a report in Ha'aretz Israel spends only 0.5 percent of the GDP on child allowances compared to an average of 1.3 percent among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) members.

Israel's dismal ranking in old-age benefits is based on a calculation that weighs pension expenditures in relation to the GDP, and the number of people entitled to the pension. In 2004 only Norway, Australia, the Czech Republic and Ireland were less generous toward their elderly citizens.

The report notes that old-age pensions in Israel include a fundamental entitlement of 16 percent of average wages and 26 percent for a couple, as well as a selective added component for recipients whose income, including the pension, falls below a set amount. The Bank of Israel says that a selective pension system benefits individuals with lower income without significantly increasing public spending, but notes expanding their use at the expense of universal pensions (which are based on a fixed sum or the number of years worked) can create negative incentives for employment.

The Bank of Israel report says that, in Israel, child allowances are given according to the number of children in a family rather than household income. A comparison of allowance levels shows that in selective systems allowances are significantly higher than universal systems and this gap widens with the number of children in the family.

 

All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.