| |||
|
IN-DEPTH FEATURES
Introduction by M. Musman
Recent memories of HaRav Shach are invariably associated with
huge crowds: his addresses to Yarchei Kallah in Ponovezh
Yeshiva, at the Yad Eliyohu stadium or at Binyanei Ha'Uma
when Degel Hatorah was founded and ultimately, at his
levayoh. These however, were already the days when his
leadership of the Torah world was axiomatic and universally
acknowledged.
Of the material that has appeared over the past two years,
much has looked back at HaRav Shach's earlier years,
identifying the buds from which the godol later
blossomed. Much has also been said and written about his
having been first and foremost -- in actual fact, solely -- a
rosh yeshiva, who saw it as his duty to convey daas
Torah and stand up for Heaven's honor. Invariably though,
written as they are from the vantage point of his later
prominence, their message is overshadowed by his towering
stature and undisputed leadership of the Torah community.
The following article takes us back almost half a century to
the intermediate period, to the days when only a handful knew
whom HaRav Shach was and appreciated him. Nobody ever crowned
him leader and he never looked for leadership. He was first
approached by the chareidi community's representatives, who
sought his Torah guidance. Many of the broader community were
not fortunate enough to understand him then or in later
years, let alone to appreciate him. Yet he never shrunk from
confronting even broadly accepted and comfortable viewpoints,
however unpopular this made him. As time and generations
passed, however, more and more people acknowledged the truth
of his ideas. Unpredictably and unforseeably, his influence
slowly grew and then mushroomed.
As much as the article testifies to HaRav Shach's integrity
as defender of daas Torah under all conditions then,
it is also evidence of our generation's yearning for and
willing acceptance of Torah true leadership.
A Generation in Search of Guidance
Looking back over HaRav Shach's long and productive life, it
would appear -- to judge from the various public notices
bearing his name -- that his involvement in communal affairs
began approximately forty years ago. Although there are
earlier accounts of him having carried messages between the
Brisker Rov and the Chazon Ish zt'l, we know of no
personal involvement on his part on those occasions.
I recall an interesting incident that took place after the
petiroh of the Brisker Rov zt'l, which took
place in 5720-1959. I asked Rabbi Shlomo Lorincz and
lhbc'l, Rabbi Shlomo Siroka z'l, who was one of
the leaders of Zeirei Agudas Yisroel, "What will be now?"
For a number of years, we had the benefit of the Chazon Ish's
direct involvement in our affairs. He led and guided our
organization of youngsters through a very problematic time.
Spending years in full time Torah study in yeshiva was not
yet the self-understood aim of Torah youth, as it is today.
We had to provide spiritually sturdy frameworks for
bochurim who were working, besides the younger age
groups.
The Chazon Ish's guidance was invaluable, particularly during
the disturbances that followed the UN decision to establish a
Jewish state and the State's coming into existence in Iyar
5708, with all the consequent problems and difficulties
regarding army service for bochurim who were not in
full-time learning.
We were also close to the Brisker Rov. After the Chazon Ish's
petiroh, he was the sole address to whom the leaders
of Z.A.I. turned, consulting him on every issue. Now he too
was gone. To whom could we turn for advice? This was what lay
behind my question to Rabbi Lorincz and Rabbi Siroka.
They told me, "Even after the dreadful calamity of the demise
of the godol hador, we boruch Hashem, have
someone to turn to, the gaon Rav Elozor Shach."
To me, this reply always stood out as evidence of the Z.A.I.
leaders' close links to gedolei Yisroel [and of their
keen intuition in divining who among them would provide the
leadership that the movement needed]. Their example of what
listening to daas Torah and to the guidelines and
directives of the gedolim truly meant, was crucial in
inculcating this understanding deep in the public
consciousness.
Another decisive contribution was made by Reb Moshe Sheinfeld
z'l. The message of his articles was absorbed by the
youth who were fortunate enough to read them -- both those
who even then saw their future within the Torah world and
also those who went out to work and even did army service but
who later filled the benches of the holy yeshivos with their
sons, who chose the yeshiva path. Those articles, the
movement's spiritual activities, the meetings, the special
"Movement Shabbosos," the summer camps and the conventions --
left deep imprints in the hearts of the participants. It is
no exaggeration to say that as a movement, Z.A.I. became the
principal channel that articulated daas Torah -- to
its members directly, and thereby to the community as a
whole.
The leaders and workers of Z.A.I. held up the life of a
ben yeshiva as the ideal for which every youngster
ought to strive for. It was no easy undertaking in those
days. Zionism's success in establishing the state to which it
had aspired gave it first place in general public opinion, to
which the chareidi community was exposed. In addition, the
vision of "tachlis" was most parents' foremost
ambition for their children. It was difficult to persuade
even some of them to give preference to continued study in
yeshiva over other courses.
With his keen perception, Reb Moshe Sheinfeld saw the
approaching revolution. In an article printed in
Digleinu in Nisan 5714, he noted that, "Anyone whose
eyes are alert can see something out of the ordinary -- the
sons are more wholehearted than their fathers."
At that time, the mission of the surviving spiritual leaders
was seen as bringing the youth fully back to their
forefathers' heritage.
This was [also] the task that confronted the Z.A.I. movement,
in whose branches and clubs boys and youths from every stream
of chareidi Jewry would gather: both Misnagdim and
Chassidim, and Sephardim too, in beautiful
fulfillment of the Agudist ideal of, "I am a friend to all
who fear You" (Tehillim 119:63).
Alongside the gradual increase in the numbers of
talmidim in the yeshivos, bochurim and
avreichim also began appearing among the followers of
the Admorim. These were the first stages in the renaissance
of chareidi Jewry, in all its various groupings.
While Z.A.I. was faithful to gedolei Yisroel of every
stripe, and thus educated its members, it was a dynamic
movement with daily activities and it needed constant and
direct guidance in all its affairs. The doors of the Chazon
Ish and the Brisker Rov had always been open to Z.A.I.'s
representatives and they now found the same reception with
HaRav Shach and the Steipler zt'l who, as is well
known, often used to refer questions to the Rosh Yeshiva.
5720: His First Recorded Appearance
A search for HaRav Shach's first steps in communal affairs
that I embarked upon among old issues of Z.A.I.'s publication
Digleinu, shows his signature on a declaration from
the Moetzes Gedolei Hatorah in the issue of Tammuz-Av 5720,
(within a year of the Brisker Rov's petiroh),
objecting to the P.A.I. (Poalei Agudas Israel) movement's
joining the government, in direct contravention of the
Moetzes' resolution forbidding it to do so. This followed
P.A.I.'s appearance in the elections on the same list as the
Agudah and its undertaking to follow all the directives of
the Moetzes.
HaRav Shach had joined the Moetzes Gedolei Hatorah while the
Brisker Rov was still alive, as a result of the influence of
HaRav Aharon Kotler zt'l (as HaRav Shach himself told
me in the summer of 5748). HaRav Don Segal related that when
Reb Aharon returned from that trip to Eretz Yisroel, he
remarked, "Boruch Hashem, I got one important thing
done just now; I managed to persuade the Rosh Yeshiva to join
the Moetzes Gedolei Hatorah."
A year later (Av 5721), besides a call to vote for the Agudah
list in the approaching elections, signed by all the great
roshei yeshiva and admorim, with HaRav Shach among
them, Digleinu also carried its first transcript of a
public address by the Rosh Yeshiva, a role it was to continue
in the years ahead. In that address, he elaborated on each
individual's obligation to hearken to the views of gedolei
Yisroel on the issue of participation in the elections
and on the vital need to strengthen Torah Jewry that was
subservient to its Torah leadership.
Until that point, HaRav Shach had only been known within
private Torah circles -- "They thought that he didn't know
anything" about communal affairs, was how HaRav Segal put it
-- but he had now come forth with a discourse that excelled
in its clarity of thought and outlook, most of whose contents
remain as relevant today as they were then.
From that point on, HaRav Shach acceded to requests for his
involvement in an array of communal affairs, such as joining
the leadership of Chinuch Atzmai, signing calls on behalf of
Keren Hashevi'is, appearing at election rallies and at
central Z.A.I. meetings and signing a call to strengthen
Digleinu.
His next major intervention in public affairs came several
years later, in 5733, as soon as news became known of the
`hetter,' by which the then Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi-
elect permitted mamzeirim to marry, with the support
of the governing Maarach (now Labor) and the National
Religious Party.
5733: His Stand Against the Infamous
`Hetter'
Several months before that Chief Rabbi's election and the
`hetter's' promulgation, a notice was circulated,
jointly signed by HaRav Yechezkel Abramsky, HaRav Yaakov
Yisroel Kanievsky, HaRav Shach, HaRav Chaim Shmuelevitz,
HaRav Moshe Chevroni, HaRav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach
zt'l and yblctv'a HaRav Eliashiv, that
stated:
"A spirit of confusion is presently passing through our Holy
Land, misleading the public, as though it were possible to
modify the halochoh that has been accepted by us since
Sinai and subsequent generations, permitting things that are
forbidden using false and spurious arguments that lack any
basis. We declare that anyone who says so, has no portion in
halochoh and his rulings should not be relied upon.
All who assist in spreading this view, which endangers the
nation's existence, will eventually be called to account by
Heaven."
When the media publicized that `hetter' with much
fanfare, the central leadership of Agudas Yisroel met in Tel
Aviv to discuss the matter. An agitated and shaken HaRav
Shach made a wholly unexpected appearance at the meeting and,
pained to the depths of his heart over the grave situation,
he spoke emotionally to the surprised participants about the
duty to respond forcefully to the dreadful breach.
This spontaneous appearance evoked a tremendous reaction, not
only in the Torah camp but among the public at large. The
Rosh Yeshiva's immersion in Torah to the exclusion of all
else, was well known. Many were deeply touched by his
appearance and he won over many hearts. None could remain
apathetic to the pain that had prompted him to speak when and
as he did, not waiting for formalities but seizing the
opportunity of the meeting to loudly protest the profanation
of Heaven's honor and of Torah's honor.
The front page of Digleinu's issue of Shevat 5733
carried the resolution of the full complement of the Moetzes
Gedolei Hatorah that was passed at a special session on the
eighth of Shevat (it was the only meeting of the Moetzes that
was also attended by HaRav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach and
ylct'a HaRav Eliashiv), in response to the
`hetter'. The same issue contained a report of a large
protest meeting held in Bnei Brak which included HaRav
Shach's brief address in the course of which he said:
"Somebody reminded me and showed me the words of the Rashbo,
in a teshuvoh to someone who explained the Torah's
accounts at variance with their plain meaning [explaining for
example] the incident of Avrohom and Soroh as a parable. The
Rashbo replied as follows: `You imagine that the Torah has no
Owner and that everyone is entitled to expound it as his
heart desires. I am still alive and I am standing guard,
showing no partiality, and you will not touch [so much as]
the point of a yud . . . '
"I cannot say these words of the Rashbo's. There is no one
[today] who can utter Rashbo's words. However, this I
can say before everybody: as long as the holy yeshivos
exist, as long as there are yeshivos in Klal Yisroel
that produce rabbonim, rulers in halochoh and
dayonim, as there ought to be and as there always have
been in Yisroel -- such a thing shall not happen! No baal
habayis can propound his own explanations. `May a
thousand like him be uprooted rather than a single letter of
the Torah be destroyed,' so writes HaRav Y.Y. Kanievsky in
his letter. I don't know if it will be me; I am not a young
avreich [any longer] . . . but whoever it will be . .
. yeshivos there will be . . .
"The Torah has given us an explicit promise: `It will not
depart from your descendants . . . ' and be'ezras
Hashem, there will be rabbonim in Yisroel -- `If there
are two, they are myself and Chanina my son' -- however many
there should be, there will always remain a nucleus of G-d-
fearing, sincere, Torah observant Jews. We hope that
Hakodosh Boruch Hu will allow His word to become
fulfilled in full."
Perhaps we may be permitted to point to these words as the
key to the sense of mission which HaRav Shach felt: "I am
still alive and I am standing guard, showing no partiality."
Granted, they are the Rashbo's words and HaRav Shach himself
said, "I cannot say these words of the Rashbo's," yet these
few -- yet forceful -- words were his guide, as was his
continual insistence that the remedy for every ill lay in
fulfilling the Torah and in the existence of holy yeshivos,
that come what may, there would always continue to be.
5734: His Resignation from the Moetzes
As we follow Digleinu's coverage of HaRav Shach's
public remarks, we find in Cheshvan 5734 a shmuess
that he delivered in Ponovezh Yeshiva during the Yom Kippur
War. In Nisan of that year appeared the hesped for
HaRav Yechezkel Levenstein zt'l.
A storm was brewing in Agudas Yisroel's affairs though. The
Agudas Yisroel organization decided, by majority vote, that
Agudah and P.A.I. would run together on the same list in the
Knesset elections that were approaching.
HaRav Shach arrived at the meeting of the Moetzes Gedolei
Hatorah already aware of what the outcome would be. He
brought with him a letter from the Steipler expressing his
determined opposition to the move. When he had finished
reading out the letter, HaRav Shach left the meeting thereby,
in effect, resigning from the Moetzes.
Many were deeply pained by this development, especially those
who followed the Steipler and HaRav Shach. This crack in the
Agudah's unity boded no good. At Z.A.I.'s meetings there was
a lot of difficult soul-searching as the elections drew
closer. Rabbi Lorincz, Z.A.I.'s president who had been chosen
to head the united list, decided to resign his post. However
HaRav Shach's entreaties prevented him from doing so.
Nonetheless, he still refused to say a single word in public
about how to vote.
I remember that Rabbi Dovid Sankevitz and myself were asked
to go and see HaRav Shach and explain to him the dilemma and
the concern of the Z.A.I. members, who wanted to know how
they should vote. We carried out our task and fully presented
the issues that the members wanted to know about to him but
HaRav Shach remained silent. He did not react at all, until
our parting greeting.
At the time, we heard that he instructed those living in the
outlying towns and settlements to vote, but to the bnei
Torah close to him, he said nothing. His silence however,
was more eloquent than a stream of words, for beneath it, his
deep pain was discernible.
The elections results reflected, for the first time, the
great growth in the size of the community that followed him
in every respect. The unified list lost an entire mandate.
Prior to the elections, Agudah had four seats and P.A.I. had
two. The new, combined list only gained five mandates and the
loss was wholly the Agudah's, for the sixth place had been
slated for one of its candidates.
This outcome, whereby HaRav Shach's publicly-known silence
had such a powerful effect, emphasized the strength of his
leadership. As of yet, no split whatsoever was in the offing,
certainly not between the groups that followed the roshei
yeshiva and those that followed the admorim.
5736: Clarifying Klal Yisroel's
Uniqueness
The front page of Digleinu's issue of Cheshvon-Kislev
5736 carried a special letter that HaRav Shach wrote in
response to the UN resolution that equated Zionism with
racism, which raised a storm throughout the Jewish world.
In this letter, HaRav Shach conveyed a clear and fundamental
message about Am Yisroel's spiritual uniqueness, upon
which the security of its position is at all times
conditional: " ` . . . That they should guard Hashem's path,
to do righteousness and justice . . . ' (Bereishis
18:19). Without a doubt, this means that if the land is
to belong to your descendants, it must be a country of
halochoh and of Hashem's laws, not of the rules and
laws of the nations, which they invented . . . "
The letter continues, "The truth is that those nations are
not the ones who are endangering our existence here. Am
Yisroel is used to, and has withstood, many decrees,
massacres and killings, and is alive and well. The ones who
are really endangering Klal Yisroel are those who have
propounded a new idea: that one can be a Jew without Torah
and mitzvos; that one can even be married to a non-Jew and
yet be an Israeli, a nationalist and a Zionist. This is how
they educate the children in their schools. They are in power
and can make propaganda that conceals the truth, in their
quest to make "Beis Yisroel like all the nations" --
like Rumania, like Yugoslavia, without Torah and mitzvos.
This puts Am Yisroel at the risk of wholesale
destruction, chas vesholom."
The letter ends with a reference to the propaganda that then
called for every Jew to respond to the UN resolution by
wearing a label that declared, "I am a Zionist."
"To those who ask how to relate to the demonstrations, the
protests and the meetings, and to sticking a label onto one's
lapel that says, `I am a Zionist,' the answer is: a Jew whose
whole appearance attests to the fact that he observes Torah
and mitzvos is [himself] the greatest demonstration of his
Jewishness and [of the fact] that he prays three times a day,
`and may our eyes behold when You return to Zion'. He has a
greater connection to our Holy Land, wherever he is, and he
needs no slogan to announce who he is.
"As for the secular Zionist ideal, the gedolim of the
past generation have already warned us that we have no part
in it. We can see ourselves how bankrupt it has become. They
thought that Yisroel would command more respect in the eyes
of the nations and that there would no longer be any
antisemitism. But the opposite has happened. Antisemitism has
grown even greater and all the protests and demonstrations
are utterly useless, for to whom do they protest? To those
who hate us, for all of Eisov['s descendants] hate Yaakov. We
shall therefore continue on our path, strengthening our faith
in Hashem and His salvation and not turning to vanities,
because the novi says, `for My salvation is close'
(Yeshaya 56:1)."
5737: His Return to the Moetzes
There was another turnabout in Agudas Yisroel's affairs in
the winter of 5737. HaRav Shach's prolonged absence from the
Moetzes Gedolei Hatorah weighed heavily on everyone's heart
and was the subject of many debates within the Agudah
institutions. Widely quoted was Rabbi Lorincz's pained
comment that the table of the Moetzes, "was missing its
fourth leg" and that every effort ought to be made to rectify
the situation.
Knesset elections were again in the offing and a delegation
of distinguished roshei yeshiva visited the Gerrer Rebbe, the
Beis Yisroel ztvk'l, to beg him to return to an Agudah
list that was independent of P.A.I. The Rebbe agreed, just a
few days before his petiroh. Two weeks later, the
Agudah's central bureau met and decided on a separate list
from P.A.I., a move which paved the way for HaRav Shach's
return to the Moetzes.
This was one of the most impressive junctures in HaRav
Shach's public standing, as he was regaled with waves of
affection and admiration. It was apparent that he felt the
full weight of the responsibility for the separate list that
he had so longed to see. At a small meeting of roshei
kollelim in Bnei Brak on chol hamoed Pesach, he
spoke stirringly of the duty to work for the success of the
Agudah list in the upcoming elections.
Several weeks later, HaRav Shach was the sole speaker at a
large meeting in Tel Aviv halls, that Z.A.I. arranged at very
short notice at his request through telegrams sent out by the
movement's energetic secretary, Rabbi Chaim Brillant. This
was an extraordinary experience for all the participants.
Hundreds upon hundreds of roshei yeshiva, roshei
kollelim and avreichim from all over the country
streamed into the hall, until there was no more room. To this
day, the writer recalls the current that went through the
crowd at the sight of the Rosh Yeshiva, who stood and spoke
at length, with youthful energy, generating enthusiasm for
taking part in the campaign, with excitement and vitality.
This writer's report of the event, which was the flagship for
the entire campaign, was given prominence in Hamodiah.
There was no doubt at the time that this meeting was one of
the crucial factors in the subsequent success in the
elections, in which the Agudah won four seats. This
achievement had important results, with the subsequent
`revolution' and transfer of power from the Labor Party to
the right wing Likud, led by Menachem Begin. The Moetzes,
with HaRav Shach now playing a full role, decided to join the
governing coalition -- without any ministerial or deputy
minister positions but accepting senior parliamentary
positions. Rabbi Shlomo Lorincz chaired the Knesset Finance
Committee.
That Knesset was the most fruitful of all in terms of
concessions won for the chareidi community, with HaRav Shach
and the Steipler presiding over all the proceedings. The
draconian draft exemption committees, before which any girl
seeking exemption from military service had to appear,
whatever her background, were now abolished. All that was
necessary was a declaration of her opposition to
conscription, on religious grounds. Several difficulties
concerning the deferment of army service for talmidim
in the holy yeshivos were also removed, such as the
problems faced by baalei teshuvoh who had embarked on
national service and who now wished to integrate fully into
the yeshiva world.
Another new law, of supreme importance, prevented autopsies
from being performed arbitrarily, against the expressed
wishes of the deceased or of the surviving family. This law
put an end to the intolerable situation that had existed for
many years, causing misery and anguish to tens of thousands
of families throughout the country.
5740: We Received Torah Without the Land
The Agudah's increased influence, which it won mainly as a
result of its enjoying HaRav Shach's full backing, led to a
further escalation in his communal standing. Henceforth, he
was subjected to very broad and intensive media coverage.
Each of his public appearances aroused interest, with one of
the peaks being reached at his unforgettable address at the
opening session of the Sixth Knessia Gedolah in 5740.
The media gave wide coverage to -- and widely decried -- his
masterly discourse, in which he bemoaned the spiritual
malaise gripping the nation at large and, despite the
Agudah's coalition partnership, did not hesitate to attack
Zionist ideology. His remarks came under particular attack
from the National Religious camp. In view of the spread of
nationalistic ideas, in the form of the settlements and
determination to keep the occupied territories, he reviewed
the fundamentals of the Torah outlook on this subject. His
key message was conveyed in the following terms:
"The Torah was given to Yisroel in the desert, in a desolate
and empty region. There was no Eretz Yisroel yet, no
territories. Yet we became an eternal nation, without Eretz
Yisroel and without territories! We had only one thing to
hold onto: the holy Torah! Through it alone were we able to
survive and are still surviving. When there is Torah in
Yisroel, there is everything and when there isn't, chas
vesholom, there is an entire parsha [about what
will happen] . . . How foolish are those who think that
there can be a Jewish nation without Torah and that nowadays,
we can survive and overcome eighty or a hundred million Arabs
who are banded around us in order to destroy us, with all the
nations of the world against us and hating us. Certainly, we
will be victorious! But how? Only through Torah! Torah shall
be eternal but without it . . . that spells destruction for
Am Yisroel! We have no other guarantee. Soldiers won't
help and neither will the IDF. We are Jews! You can be Turks
or Germans without Torah but under no circumstances Jews."
HaRav Shach's determined stand regarding the territories were
like thorns in the eyes of the nationalist groups and of
those in the Lubavitch movement who followed them. He
nevertheless stood firm, despite all the opposition to his
path and to his positions.
He was also unafraid of taking a public stand, together with
the Steipler, against some of the other goings on in the
above movement, particularly the messianic trends. In so
doing, he exposed himself to the most venomous kind of
propaganda campaign against him, yet nothing could deter him.
He once even told Rav Shlomo Lorincz that he was not even
afraid of being physically harmed, so long as he could
publicly declare the truth, as it emerged from the daas
Torah that we have received from our teachers and from
the gedolim of previous generations.
5742: The Torah World Rallies to Defend his
Honor
In Teves 5742, at the height of the campaign against him
(which was aided and abetted by assistants who did not belong
to the Lubavitch movement) an extraordinary protest was
issued by the gedolim of America, led by HaRav Moshe
Feinstein, HaRav Yaakov Kamenetsky and HaRav Yaakov Yitzchok
Ruderman zt'l, and countersigned by tens of other
roshei yeshiva. The circular protested, "the slander and
vituperation [being leveled] against one of the greatest of
our generation's gedolim, the elder of the roshei
hayeshivos in Eretz Yisroel, who raises the banner of
daas Torah high and expresses the Torah's views on
every matter relating to Klal Yisroel."
A similar call was circulated in Eretz Yisroel, while a
particularly scathing editorial in Hamodiah (penned by
the present writer) observed that, "while HaRav Shach and his
ilk are in no need of our defense, and his stature is not
affected in the slightest by the those whose coarseness and
ignorance render them incapable of understanding even his
mundane speech, Torah Jewry and Agudas Yisroel, among whose
heads and leaders he is numbered, cannot forgo his honor. As
noted, the insult is not only to him but to the entire Torah
world, the Moetzes Gedolei Hatorah and Agudas Yisroel
too."
At this point, things took an unexpected course. Sadly, not
all the groups in Agudas Yisroel saw matters in the above
light. When HaRav Shach realized that behind the scenes, a
partnership with the Lubavitch movement was in the offing, he
decided to leave the Agudah framework altogether. In the
meantime, an additional factor was greatly distressing him --
the repudiation of a full undertaking that had been given to
a Sephardic representative to sit in the Knesset for half the
term; this was something which HaRav Shach had personally
guaranteed.
Later, in 5744, this led him to rule that Sephardic Jewry
should run for the Knesset on an independent list -- which
enjoyed an astonishing success, winning four mandates all at
once, while the Agudah dropped to two mandates.
Establishing an Independent Framework for the
Torah World
From this point on, all the rules of the game changed and
steps were taken that later led to the Torah world's
organization into an independent entity, headed by the
gedolei haTorah and led by the Rosh Yeshiva. To begin
with, Yated Ne'eman started publication, at the behest
of the Steipler and HaRav Shach. It succeeded in establishing
itself, against all odds and despite all forecasts to the
contrary (including the present writer's, who was closely
acquainted with all the problems and obstacles involved in
both starting but principally in maintaining, the publication
of a daily newspaper).
Later, in 5749, HaRav Shach established Degel Hatorah and
what followed after that is well known, including the
establishment of the Shearis Yisroel kashrus
organization, headed by the HaRav Chaim Sho'ul Karelitz
zt'l, who was another of Z.A.I.'s guiding lights.
Today, there is no doubt whatsoever that all these
enterprises succeeded in the merit of HaRav Shach, who was
universally recognized as, "a man whose Master assists
him."
Finally, in closing, the part played by the Z.A.I. movement
and its publication, Digleinu, in the days before
Degel Hatorah and Yated Ne'eman, must be acknowledged.
Ever since HaRav Shach first entered the communal scene as a
leader of Torah Jewry, Z.A.I.'s leadership, workers and
members dedicated themselves to the furtherance of his
reputation and his Torah outlook, among the broader
community. No sacrifice was too great for them, quite
literally, for the sake of this sublime end.
|
All material
on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.